IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Tue, 27 September 2011 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342C021F8BE9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQEPbtQKBI5d for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s1.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s1.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5FA21F8BCD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU152-W64 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s1.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:03:22 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU152-W641047D45C0DF6A490EEF193F00@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_aeb086f7-8616-496b-b0f1-59815d9f8ba0_"
X-Originating-IP: [98.203.198.61]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: roman@telurix.com
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:03:21 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxt1mn-pcWW01a1wT0yCToaL1NL5Fjt-NJbJYmx=Ygrk6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com>, <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E80984A.903@skype.net>, <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1087@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <BLU152-W62B7F2AC3F0D5B6E277CB993F00@phx.gbl>, <CAD5OKxt=P3jg9N0weFUZLvUYQxyeXa+9YMtpc8wn7osuPQmTpg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxtVCgiFV_iAYd1w0uZZcS5+gsixOHJ0jGN=0CMdq++kdg@mail.gmail.com>, <84254826-C357-4FB5-810D-C453A2D1304C@phonefromhere.com>, <CAD5OKxt1mn-pcWW01a1wT0yCToaL1NL5Fjt-NJbJYmx=Ygrk6Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2011 16:03:22.0722 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB6EEC20:01CC7D2E]
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:00:37 -0000

Roman Shpount said:

"It does not matter what they run. Quite a few of them do not run GSM, but I can cost effectively call every one of them using SIP/G.711, and that's what very important. It will take some amount of time to upgrade this infrastructure to support SRTP and ICE."

[BA] Why would it be necessary to upgrade wireless carrier infrastructure?  Presumably a service that wants to make calls to E.164 numbers will install a gateway that enables this.  Wireless carriers wouldn't have to upgrade.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status