Re: [rtcweb] #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Mon, 04 November 2013 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06BA21E82E3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:40:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRWO12oJxCJV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3333811E8243 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ar20so13329892iec.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:40:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ugq+Bntn9y1dV23n3OmFvbf/FCs2DMauEYDWebSfZPI=; b=XmoEsRv0GHUpKtlQ3JyuBAKSvZnG+5K/0BCkorWhBl07Lup54QbuvFdDSOBynZGowC IWkoVtZjz/fx0Fa3+GW1qzirO9t80KpJ7cGgnbbmJw7eVg2zHe7LSfDzRFsE12jdy2zy AJ8eTXFGoo8A6Fp3RYDos9+U8O5QZoGNK0si05UCNdyCti3VsjQm3+hx9q30FUHlMPd5 R0E1/+Ndh26k8UhK+FlnzBRXozgEj/UG9YXrYmklt+PTqVYZCgAkP3J5DPQVrhFcifKN dIYhoIs6bWXd/Jo5Q4eqh+m+h4ao3g+adZ6vwg+gsp9t8M5J8+OghPcaN2MDIrO3Dql5 vYXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2pHykcDx8br+Fi1401x8tkm6uQBWsoi46bWCuBlpBeTANLKieBWw0ApH28V9aibb3aiB+
X-Received: by 10.50.126.74 with SMTP id mw10mr14119406igb.24.1383608440653; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm5095114igj.10.2013.11.04.15.40.39 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52783076.8040909@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:40:38 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <066.e25c55f4beabdbb9b445f98350fa83ad@trac.tools.ietf.org> <081.57895a6b03345471a2f1c4670beb7362@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <081.57895a6b03345471a2f1c4670beb7362@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:40:48 -0000

On 04/11/2013 6:38 PM, rtcweb issue tracker wrote:
> #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement
>
> Changes (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com):
>
>   * status:  new => closed
>   * resolution:   => fixed
>
>

     <sigh> Here we go again. I'd love to know how the WG plans to 
remove SDP as an implementation detail from version 2.0 if version 1.0 
explicitly mentions the use of SDP (instead of an opaque token).

Gili