[rtcweb] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-03: (with COMMENT)
Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 30 September 2022 12:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975C8C14F744; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 05:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, sean@sn3rd.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <166454153661.58711.10539840892446481600@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 05:38:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/diJ1ZSPviUwxVWqHnWOwkAtUPU8>
Subject: [rtcweb] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 12:38:56 -0000
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-03 CC @larseggert Thanks to Joel Halpern for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/i_745aF4T6deyFdN6ocUBuddfg8). ## Comments ### Inclusive language Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for background and more guidance: * Term `traditional`; alternatives might be `classic`, `classical`, `common`, `conventional`, `customary`, `fixed`, `habitual`, `historic`, `long-established`, `popular`, `prescribed`, `regular`, `rooted`, `time-honored`, `universal`, `widely used`, `widespread` ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Outdated references Reference `[RFC4566]` to `RFC4566`, which was obsoleted by `RFC8866` (this may be on purpose). Reference `[RFC5285]` to `RFC5285`, which was obsoleted by `RFC8285` (this may be on purpose). Reference `[RFC6347]` to `RFC6347`, which was obsoleted by `RFC9147` (this may be on purpose). Reference `[RFC5245]` to `RFC5245`, which was obsoleted by `RFC8445` and `RFC8839` (this may be on purpose). Reference `[RFC8843]` to `RFC8843`, which was obsoleted by `RFC9143` (this may be on purpose). ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
- [rtcweb] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-uber… Lars Eggert via Datatracker