Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 20 January 2014 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1B01A025F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:27:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhW-hH6GvMMF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338E41A022E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GEQ91n0011YDfWL58KT6nE; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:27:06 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GKT51n00h3ZTu2S3gKT6Hp; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:27:06 +0000
Message-ID: <52DD7889.8030209@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:27:05 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CALiegfkJe1QfMcPoDg4+71oujHUzJy86_pnLXDO9C=g_v8_4Lg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D107730@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfkhs5JeVj-2YL2QJgwMgB1cP77aUZEWdoywQCpQd_O6Ag@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D10819E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmyOayaz41FM+3xF733srs8MUKGMumW7nAfT53EnfEaWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmyOayaz41FM+3xF733srs8MUKGMumW7nAfT53EnfEaWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1390246026; bh=F/CIwVQn2qRf7MTTM8PFPyp7cahI7BzMAKW9Z4ODYIw=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=cuWOll4a2pwHxxfLYERDD2B9lgtwGjR4qbJaVHPEKSC40KZzeh0NkelLTtE6M+8b4 vB+apfMiV7iz6rdPIyBdCI9nZ9ea8hcLz+CZBBV0Xu7Z/N9hKYlTq1d9YK2Zv3qJR+ GX4csDSs/ofFMeNOE7XWKjLzEoJjocXZMjZaj8PpLwujx5OB29h5INsDVEX4BcyWZW YE5o9c6rDmF9SUaRBcUGiodUx8R0gq/Zsn9TmtWBsmYwpffTjFgFxBp1OgLDLIIH1O 4esHtHn9/x40YFF6wvKnBOZ+IGxEQaSmlvwF6SBtu5qAN6e6JGbHakzQDM3L4B2h8v trMi0XfMPs3Ig==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:27:07 -0000

On 1/20/14 8:47 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2014/1/20 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>:
>> I can’t comment on what people implement, but the specifications of some UP
>> features, e.g. the partial offer/answer mechanism, are not ready, so they
>> can’t be implemented yet.
>
> What we need, at least, is to drop the absurd rule of SDP "the answer
> MUST have the same number of m lines as the offer in order to match
> them".

What is it that troubles you about this.

I guess from prior comment that you want to add more m-lines in the answer?

But O/A is a negotiation/handshake. If you include extra m-lines in the 
answer then there is no completion to the negotiation of those.

	Thanks,
	Paul