Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot

Gaelle Martin-Cocher <> Tue, 12 March 2013 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343CA11E8179 for <>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.133
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.133 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFciueuRECBH for <>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6637B11E80FB for <>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a412830-b7ef86d00000339d-a1-513f75d8c59c
Received: from ( []) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (SBG) with SMTP id 2E.DD.13213.8D57F315; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:37:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:37:12 -0400
Received: from ([fe80::99b8:8d0e:cdcd:c00d]) by ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:37:11 -0400
From: Gaelle Martin-Cocher <>
To: Ted Hardie <>, David Singer <>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
Thread-Index: AQHOH0jpubeezyLlMka1Nd5JzNGBEZiintGAgAAFyAD//718IA==
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:37:11 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrGKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC5bjwpO6NUvtAg+5rJhbH7tRYrP3Xzm4x v/8ji0XjXDsHFo+tJ3+weeycdZfdY8mSn0wBzFENjDZJiSVlwZnpefp2Nol5efkliSWpCimp xcm2Sj6p6Yk5CgFFmWWJyZUKLpnFyTmJmbmpRUoKmSm2SiZKCgU5icmpual5JbZKiQUFqXkp SnZcChjABqgsM08hNS85PyUzL91WyTPYX9fCwtRS11DJTjehkyfj2RvNgmlsFQtWfGNvYPzK 0sXIySEhYCIx++4hNghbTOLCvfVgtpBAO5NER6tHFyMXkL2SUeLs2kvsEM5cRonFe84xgVSx CVhK/H+1B2ySiICLxMdFt8FsZgFfiUOHW8BqhIHit14sY4KocZV4+3QGI4TtJHGjqQFsG4uA qsTn2yvA4rwCnhJn17xjhFi2lFGid8ImsASnQKBEw869rF2MHByMAioSJ5+GQ+wSl7j1ZD4T xAcCEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwphK0rsfXaUCaJeT+LG1ClsELa2xLKFr5kh9gpKnJz5hAXie02J ky/OMU5glJiFZMUsJO2zkLTPQtK+gJFlFaNgbkaxgZlhcl6yXlFmrl5easkmRnDC0TDYwfj+ vcUhRgEORiUe3rfF9oFCrIllxZW5hxglOJiVRHj/+gKFeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMboCQ2gi sxR3cj4wGeaVxBsbGODmKInzigSKBgoJpAOTWHZqakFqEcwcJg5OkD1cUiLFwFSUWpRYWpIR D0qY8cXAlCnVwDjB81XeZK8cYRa1BYJiL/be5rqYYCjglnfIZ99jWwlZgzVfT33Z/2EF8xXB M7/amd2CTHgW8jgZBLNINicm3+m83Ltp6ZmvzvPa3sy3VD7zdb2+p0vDI8+cmk3md7ecz0m8 tEL60CTWRmcBTq7lEjLXgz6xPm6Y2qsf976pbXWin88t38kqIUosxRmJhlrMRcWJANFXex15 AwAA
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:37:22 -0000

Magnus and I discussed this with the RAI area directors last night at some length, and our joint conclusion was that the presentations could go ahead in the existing agenda slot because there was technical content to discuss.  Those discussions need to happen in advance of the overall consensus call, and we concluded that we could likely do that at this meeting without having to re-do it again in the light of new IPR data.  (In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that Cullen disagreed with this, but was not able to attend the discussion with the ADs, as he has been unavoidably detained).

[gmc] so why was those technical aspects not discussed at the prior meeting?
 Can there just be a technical discussion with no questions?


This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.