Re: [rtcweb] SRTP not mandatory-to-use

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 14 December 2011 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C49321F86AA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.168, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bXinazkKXJT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A246421F863E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so722253ggn.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.152.65 with SMTP id uw1mr5664523obb.10.1323863003183; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:43:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.39.137 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:43:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAErhfrwu322=HTS0JZhum9EGfb73KmYS6CU_KMESyzEWhtvg2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAErhfrwu322=HTS0JZhum9EGfb73KmYS6CU_KMESyzEWhtvg2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfn9uXuhjeYAq_bwNEcpJV3fWSAJwKFQVz=z8pZ_1cF67A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SRTP not mandatory-to-use
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:43:24 -0000

2011/12/14 Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>:
> The VPN already provides encryption when needed. If co-workers want to
> remotely access the VPN, an IPsec tool can already provide the encryption.

SRTP provides MUCH MORE than just that, it has been largely discussed
and explained in this maillist. Pease don't simplify so much.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>