IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] draft-ibc-rtcweb-sip-vs-websocket

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Tue, 13 September 2011 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFAD21F8CC4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iiULzM6KDoNH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E3321F8C84 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwj18 with SMTP id 18so1363830gwj.27 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xaOAinYgM4KSlCDqD6ztLulQVF3dYbYKubOs4QResjw=; b=qOsRY2/ynThs9lfzBhS04Fzn+dndBqxCT/MqMbZGn6LgTr2z/u3bhlIgZka1zT1ZVb Pc/wTp0hxmG2w2uKD4bZ7sdC7VA8PWNamyk7eU3+J3bgiQhDJl4Q9Nc5ZTy7zcoOwhHb cCvztiKVfgMIcvX/MEC0aXYHbCOIHwp+T900E=
Received: by 10.42.19.8 with SMTP id z8mr1157951ica.274.1315953600041; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g16sm2859437ibs.8.2011.09.13.15.39.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E6FDC3D.8070506@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:42:05 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110505 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CALiegfk6BhtzErXOQM8iSV7FC6isYUwOS1KPYCw_M1vEcNP6eQ@mail.gmail.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0B37@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620AEC41@008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com> <BLU152-W91B8D02E434D6209F379393050@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU152-W91B8D02E434D6209F379393050@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-ibc-rtcweb-sip-vs-websocket
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:37:57 -0000

On 09/13/2011 03:04 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> > So maybe this draft is something that should be taken to Standards 
> Track within the RAI area, ASAP.
>
> [BA] The main point is that this work need not be done in RTCWEB.
>
>

Right.

Notice here in "EAP multiplexing model" (for smartcards):

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-urien-eap-smartcard-21#section-2.1

In cars, that would be PPPoE instead of PPP if we map from SIP. The 
developer curve is.... not stateless.





-- 
--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email