[rtcweb] CNAMEs and multiple peer connections

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2021A000D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iuS5UHNaotN9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB891A03AF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so892340wes.29 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 02:04:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0qfoDNCqdLTwBu6FY5b/8X+HnjfqGvZAjHWlBIeYfPM=; b=bHRRVLBWh2PtpxGjFNn0Lv7wRE2+QtEnaqnti+61mH9TFvwUXlHpks7p+Ydn2cKukw HQ8qGwo9OyQvoasoCWQW2zoxf4T/kbcIwtDd/Ilyw3u2V6ZHZYDzJvOmONCh+ipbN49G lW3HIcNuSkjBXhOZMdDX8KnoAuWi5DJjrTnB1U5AINV6iLyfA2oC7QNdEDbQ7R8LMLgh H1TA6mLFe8b4UCaSt2QcoBuCVi3d20QTipuZuS92dHT7UQdjtD1iPUdn+LUAVKzLdFLL nMjpED1dsKuQREssasrKLHZNc9u05hA6Ict6IV7NhSntr5CBHMudVgDn3avndupPLgNA 8JjQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.236.9 with SMTP id uq9mr6944396wjc.31.1394013872009; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 02:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:04:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWGQ7GtKd33iF-RNbkeAyqKYshaPDDB=sAh5o-izKichQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/eRJXCwVpY_6M-_H2I0Y75EWXFH4
Subject: [rtcweb] CNAMEs and multiple peer connections
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:04:37 -0000

I haven't thought about this in detail yet, but I wanted to ensure
that this issue is tracked.  I think that our chairs might be able to
create an issue in some tracker.  Can I request that they do that for
this issue?