Re: [rtcweb] Agenda requests for Atlanta meeting

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 11 October 2012 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C5821F8742 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VVh2sGzw9kfy for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ED621F8740 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F30039E057 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZGcMUW2atvu for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:23:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (unknown [188.113.88.47]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0EEE39E04C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5076E4CD.2020602@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:25:01 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <506B0367.4000103@ericsson.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB111867718@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340BAD03A6@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11187F8F1@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340BAD087E@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118810C3@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118810C3@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda requests for Atlanta meeting
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:23:14 -0000

On 10/09/2012 04:16 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 23:41 , Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
>   wrote:
>>
>> I have no problem with that. But, again, we do need to get the JSEP O/A sorted out. My suggesting is still that the base should be RFC 3264, and if we need to "relax" things we should very carefully look at those cases.
> I have not seen any reason to relax 3264 yet but if something comes up, agree we should carefully look at the cases. I think we can just do straight up 3264. Arguments that SIP early media in a 180 is not compliant with 3264 are just wrong.
>
This seems to be true as long as I consider the offer/180 exchange a 
separate SDP exchange from the offer/answer exchange, and abandon the 
concept that the final answer "updates" the 180 answer.

Is that what you are saying, or did I squint the wrong way?