Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch: Final PRs

Sean Turner <> Mon, 22 July 2019 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC811200B5 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHaFXMtE1Ty4 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50154120059 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id v22so28623539qkj.8 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=pzRg89YnTPe2Te7WQf84X7UYHnNGmCEO6orkmlxX6r4=; b=Gi/4zyGkbk35xOMtymA8WOdQc8BOkdWz50u88z+GWh5cw7bxa2KV/vV/5zM/mPLX+b IEbJtaSQSFbYSqiqbFpmZmPb/hsH1vrX5UD4nn4ktD2HkAQHufCH0Ndq+evYzoGREWkR stta8BOlcEEccZCnkzW1J2y8R/+L7TzfvKWJ8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=pzRg89YnTPe2Te7WQf84X7UYHnNGmCEO6orkmlxX6r4=; b=QfjrXVUlwNltQ5I9cRhg5t/9sHvKFxcEDgze9qe0GMcSoC6G/FQCVYnZIVRT8BV0FJ /gvXJ0dehmNKOKGQGqkg9/52qmm1/KrCjQZOlyOCp0PNmlNzZ5yJ9U/4EvvAXqdmnJ76 2y5iBjrFtsZKtW19VnCkAi+LTmaJ90yMNFX3jOSpSY1L6qwP+CrTjxbb37mH08ylEwTw fiOPv9zjj3MwGXFCSqYEBDTMdlvaxJRjQ5YUzry5B3x5x/3oimko9X+/24z1OexuEZ7i 6SAsNFWbRG1ifE1rKGT+Fb7TDs4Ajpj33q5MuH2Tu1B5HIBI1fSMgZd2P7SRgmLykXp0 UJ9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkfOta8JAe9iGoo/KaYHWcVoIP22gRQmxbaduXI1aGYsh7eIeN moa0e2KrdlAqZAmsRnVg1ZYRyzaPLGc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxwPLz5RHXTK+UiV/lioWbh9IC/u1UQ3uYZpufddjomGdSQOwgvCdXRLzyRicOf13RvIPjyDA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6982:: with SMTP id e124mr13066261qkc.291.1563803661292; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:b81e:cafc:6735:5203? ([2001:67c:1232:144:b81e:cafc:6735:5203]) by with ESMTPSA id j61sm18346523qte.47.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:54:19 -0400
References: <>
To: RTCWeb IETF <>, Eric Rescorla <>, Adam Roach <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch: Final PRs
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:54:24 -0000


Jully 22nd is here so I am going to close this out and consider the PRs approved.


Please spin a new version to incorporate the PR for the reference change.


Once the new version hits the street feel free to hit the button to move this to the next state.


> On Jul 10, 2019, at 19:12, Sean Turner <> wrote:
> Hi! ekr has spun a new version of draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arc [0].  All of the changes were to address the outstanding IESG DISCUSS positions or were a result of following on discussions with Ben K (Security AD).  While I think all of these are good changes, there were three changes that affected 2119-language and we need to get the WGs take on these.  Two of these changes are in s5.1.4  (SHOULD->MUST and the addition of a new MUST) and one is in s7.6 (addition of a new SHOULD).  These are most easily seen by looking at the diffs [1].  If you object to these changes, then please let the list know by July 22nd.
> Note that these are the last issues remaining before this draft as well as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security and draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling can move into the RFC editor’s queue.  At that point we will be dangerously close to be done.
> Thanks,
> spt
> [0]
> [1]