Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

Speaking as an individual:

I am putting my name on 2), because I believe RECOMMENDED is too strong 
for secondary codecs.

On 12/20/2012 09:29 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> WG,
>
> As an outcome of the Vancouver IETF meeting codec discussions we did
> promise to run a call for consensus regarding if the WG was interested
> in specifying a small set of recommended audio codecs. We are sorry this
> has been delayed until now.
>
> The question for the call of consensus is between two options.
>
> 1) Run a process in the WG to select and specify a small set of
> audio/speech codecs that would be RECOMMNEDED to implement by a WebRTC
> end-points
>
> 2) Do nothing and let the already specified Mandatory to Implement Audio
> codecs be the only audio codecs mentioned in the WebRTC specification.
>
> Please indicate your position by January 16th 2013.
>
> Regards
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb