Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7108511E813A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id erlOn7-CfmGJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E61611E8124 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id fb19so1699681obc.38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r4XSe7fxyC3OExREbyfpCpmbpk1Zuqya9zuJfPdKwhI=; b=SBzweVIBSLQ83ep554SCXKQj3O3ZgpVTKx4uofv1/rC/vMEn4vJVRHoShxblyh3Y3P hmh1wn3SUteXCq38SVojOHOaUfZN8juC6cHe4Y8Fngsi1icCSx5MCfQsQEjUjIP7rcHA p6qyTNEH5gom6C5SvdmcWSp0SXFkoVhzvzHWhXLqUV+tKCB0vhUSoVggbpHwqLKyJYSd ea0YWv9/uGHiL3Te6oeLPoizchLRpuRwC7Oo93fBExP5XsSJAoPW/XKlCXptvRnudJUO SiQyMzqNSMTTyQGfxiVPBkonGcxjnyi5tbaYOWShgxpFmqIJ8guaok29JEEMa2RS68Cm qrdA==
X-Received: by 10.182.128.68 with SMTP id nm4mr19822926obb.56.1375138391126; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.173.106 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnU0U0juKu8y68K-pfkdf9NwQPxH=yM7vt=1EZEg=fxtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfnU0U0juKu8y68K-pfkdf9NwQPxH=yM7vt=1EZEg=fxtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:52:51 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=D6jSmBGLtnhVYHj5FVKZ+X2x_KUM2ab1APVALMELQDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:53:12 -0000

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> Hi, I initiated a thread [*] about Plan-Unified and multiple m lines,
> but it was moved to MMUSIC maillist (don't know why since it is about
> WebRTC applications design):
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg11966.html
>
> Sorry for the cross-posting but at this point I'm a bit lost and do
> not know which is the appropriate group for my concern.
>
>
>
> So my concern is:
>
>
> - Web application with a SIP over WebSocket client running in the web.
>
> - The web user is provided with a conference SIP URI in which there
> are *already* 8 participants (5 of them emitting audio and video and 3
> just emitting audio).
>
> - The user calls, from his webphone, to the given URI to join the conference.
>
>
>
> Let's imagine that the JS app knows the number of participant in the conference.
> Let's imagine my browser have mic and webcam.
>
>
>
> QUESTION:
>
> How can my browser join the conference without requiring SDP
> renegotiation from the server and, at the same time, being able to
> send audio/video and receive audio/video from others (different tracks
> / m=lines)?
>
>
>
>
> "SOLUTIONS":
>
>
>
> 1)
>
> I tell my browser to generate a SDP offer with:
>
>   - 1 send/receive m=audio line.
>   - 7 recvonly m=audio line.
>   - 1 send/only m=video line.
>   - 4 recvonly m=video line.
>
> (Obviously this is a joke)


Since you seem to be doing a full mesh and you seem to be wanting to
receive from everyone and be able to talk back to everyone, wouldn't
this need to be 8 different SDP offers in a full mesh network rather
than one SDP offer with 13 different m-lines? I don't follow how each
of the recipients would pick the right m-line for themselves...



> 2)
>
> SDP seems to allow that the offer and the answer have different number
> of m lines (I'm not aware of that but I believe that SDP can do
> "everything"). So my browser generates a SDP offer with 1 m=audio line
> and 1 m=video line, and the server replies with 8 m=audio lines and 4
> m=video lines.
>
> Will my browser understand such a SDP answer with more m lines than
> its generated offer? I assume NOT.

I'm don't understand SDP, but logic would tell me that it would send a
single SDP offer with its own capabilities to each of the other 8
participants:
m=audio send/receive

(not sure if it also needs m=video, since it's not a video capable device IIUC)


> 3)
>
> My browser generates a SDP offer with 1 m=audio line and 1 m=video
> line and the server too. And later the server sends re-INVITE with all
> the m lines.
>
> Oppss, SDP renegotiation...

Yes, I would expect a negotiation to happen between each of the 8
current participants and the one new participant individually.
It would end up in 8 O/A negotiations that should all end up with 5
m=audio send/receive and 3 m=audio receive-only (from the POV of the
webphone.



I'm taking a stab at this because I want to understand more about how
it works, but I actually have no idea if I am correct. Please,
somebody with SDP knowlege, clarify how this would actually work. I,
too, am very curious.

Thanks,
Silvia.