Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 21 June 2013 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5EE21E810E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYVKPslL7jRI for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB38921E8106 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f14so524647qak.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=5Uh0KcJswBnWjp3zaXVxDo/3OcT+l1mTqW6dxZ+Sqtw=; b=CGDQ8fBN6Oe+15w8eHVf8ATTk0tkRWb18SUbi2u0eOwNXkyqENit7s6uiR8USXE5F+ v/66VJ39UFM6BXQDsQJYXXphPuL9KM+qRDXvZJRAr2ULubf5NTwFeshGdiU0BRxH5Wjh X5xzTcqq80BWGHujDLQRvs2BUPs/O5BU/umAfJVQ0BhqcciqskAAHmpArEiB7rAspXwu OdiVF/DbNlcmfnqEp3POjQgy95qNEWnldGsYrsOjEBWnzidG3enYpO4ATO+RViQW7dAZ r9qLzJkXYe77x7IpG/M2tPZbR95dvy/EDz2Oauk7MJc6HNE5RFQdjwtJgAsyRWnODr3l XTZw==
X-Received: by 10.49.35.108 with SMTP id g12mr5481331qej.86.1371820156152; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115D4A97@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <51C20FAA.4050701@hookflash.com> <CABkgnnWw9anT+h_hnF14nBChS73qpTb31hSM=p2KnGrcRPGRJA@mail.gmail.com> <51C3209B.1030501@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfkEpwxNZL8TU0ofCzRB_Gza+NoSnZpGcM=tuYBOXmHsZQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C335F9.4000900@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfk_wwvdSixFYWpBBdUNfXxmcOwCnRsjyS6J3M9WG_dJCg@mail.gmail.com> <51C38356.3020402@jitsi.org> <CALiegfm1xYpAnmrg=4vx_06RZQTo_RS2nFJoidpoQtjg2kn=Vw@mail.gmail.com> <1371807600.23131.YahooMailNeo@web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115D4A97@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:08:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=ByjJxwNE0_hrkxsM6xzfLDO=bby5ZvyheNaf1f6dd=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmie3/XHY/BBrrAdl/PMjUNc8/Pj65H6pX0q0k6uQ2Njxn86itVeJDA6O2BemMl1RQD3IQH
Cc: "diopmamadou@doubango.org" <diopmamadou@doubango.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:09:18 -0000

2013/6/21 Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>om>:
> Let's concentrate on making sure all those innovative apps already written deployable before we start trying to satisfy the requirements of the mega application developers.

As said before, if WebRTC 1.0 borns with SDP O/A inside, WebRTC 2.0
will also (given the "backward compatibility" and given that WebRTC
1.0 will be a real standard, rather than the tons of draft we have
today).


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>