Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Fri, 22 November 2013 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EB41ADF8F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lmMpuDC8SHB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com (mail-pb0-f52.google.com [209.85.160.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E949A1AE19B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id uo5so1465678pbc.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=BXU0Z4fwILGzWKBcVhTZ8N2T/VuY3czq816RQYS0Ff8=; b=msrfCDF5twI+AfnQWuluCwQrhB9O7rU9/aB9cBBTKaIdrwpGEPZqoOk74UM/exCfSd gbVMJwwE0LYQVkJ2uE+0ddsTIhyR2Cy3YMQ9CYaOqx/2ijhcOA3J18rlo4xAc8LXBDQc lXxkAW5GjEnv8dBFoBTOs0eJaEiGNRWxOCNBu4ETvjbUeaM2EEtJg60K7/IC4iZpMXxE f1VHCh9+ixkGsqyg1pHc4tvac5FFo/gsGttzfGPzl+sMPEjNa8WVEkJv2ih9neWZr5UI EwSyxtKQEuB83Qo9/hTa0kDEIFICvnS1EH4hMPxraOtehB4V5AE8P5X7p0v2kIBUT8F7 XCgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2lS9sS3A1ex4hhayrn1zPnoZIwvsHBqiUW7t7WVTy9HNu7hr8O9rCj3831Z2GKqDwTFDC
X-Received: by 10.68.244.2 with SMTP id xc2mr3461008pbc.58.1385135360954; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ik1sm27268811pbc.9.2013.11.22.07.49.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id rd3so1465551pab.35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.68.113.130 with SMTP id iy2mr4143311pbb.2.1385135360150; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.13.234 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:49:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8uru89ha1p0cccvq5qr8mtcnl4mvmkelhk@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <528E5057.30408@stpeter.im> <F89641F6-BC91-4BF2-89CB-26F5C187A66A@apple.com> <528E7033.2090502@gmail.com> <528F68CC.40106@usdonovans.com> <8uru89ha1p0cccvq5qr8mtcnl4mvmkelhk@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:49:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvvaaJdcDUZ=x0G_zAuEVihGB_u3Ly=OoVfh6Mq8f4iSFhzCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:49:39 -0000

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>; wrote:
> * Steve Donovan wrote:
>>I am personally uncomfortable with the process as proposed.  I am one of
>>those referred to as a "lurker" in previous emails.  This is my first
>>post to this mailing list.  I have, however, read hundreds/thousands of
>>emails sent to this list.  I have also signed the previous three rtcWEB
>>blue lists.  I have not participated in meetings via Jabber.
>
>>I do NOT think that inventing arbitrary criteria for determining if I am
>>eligible to vote is a good precedent to be setting in the IETF.
>
> The proposed criteria boil down to that anyone who can point to public
> IETF records of their past participation in the Working Group can vote.
> That is the most predictable set of criteria, and not arbitrary at all.

It does however produce a voter base that is of arbitrary relevance to
the choice that we are trying to make.

Emil

--
https://jitsi.org