[rtcweb] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11

מנחם דודג' <menachemdodge1@gmail.com> Sun, 17 February 2019 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <menachemdodge1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8468A124BAA; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:58:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.77
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.77 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nIYQ2Gc1bHA; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa35.google.com (mail-vk1-xa35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA2171292F1; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa35.google.com with SMTP id y14so3439450vkd.1; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:58:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2nko5san7wRXwnLLnnjXJAYWvO8KjlymykUhNCeqWys=; b=qq7MOwMuT7W2KnC1yG/0cBbb5GWM9T29lQM/dTcsRJFPmik2KrEpzx1ikk+zXIznbo ENBG1N7hoWrEyiNR9dqyL2fkTvfAVwomm3dm1fMxW0G3LGLmUbwItsW09ILHDLl3ycER 8RRUYjDiQgAYFDFFZhXLypJ85gxnVpYrPnl6xgRtQWY+HULX8OfaJwKMfocOBGz+BS1C ZcQPxx137drCYYb4eRYKIoXEPqz1e+pPbs3GBrxU21gmZG/lJ3USZVUoTx1ypvcE8CLJ 0F9e35VU8xlQm/DrgkbPlQCYWZOGqs6D8LTz+Nh+2h5kP7ktcXPWRXnOE+ERb3wgCmt2 WZFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2nko5san7wRXwnLLnnjXJAYWvO8KjlymykUhNCeqWys=; b=dWA3QvPqkJqh9VCIMmP38lTBiY3sqS9kVX3ylcFE2CS4JNR/zfegwP6i5EqGsBFvwn DHevHZ8il7uBDnnx3egc3HcaOwrgpYrVKT+w3ymrxwPlaHPnIXDPIneT8Kfrcbuycdtz Jo+2sVh+AfIxBEMlLobAjXH77lgxXMV+15DAPC+icw3dXi6vXYk7tGN3SFxIFztQnAJp d+DGl4dP2Hj/uwOgp3t/rfzJIuLe5ICarE7LS0+c4ep4RqQb/6LzUYZjuL2JpYtfhmcO F/5CgaMdiIPCYgBSlnP7LzKFer2wFMfpQgEt2EoyCIySUpMlYWW7cbJd3IB0dtoGJBSR Tvag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubBtzzhyuW2JUumkrAYNAFqYDfknYh9iZkX/iln+ZpWXG6BlGpZ v9WbJDudLmzRXmcRu/vCbHpqI5anP8lktr1d3aF+T3M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaijKr3eCdHsEPmqSpBpiK4vIuE5Sapel7gW8WE6/CWwPGSYNmT8DqtDY+jWhOgNf7f/A8q6F6Fim90K+LXrQY=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1ac3:: with SMTP id a186mr10501414vka.34.1550440682373; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:58:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?B?157XoNeX150g15PXldeT15In?= <menachemdodge1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 23:57:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ2jOhWA6iFk-VNA=f7cf+US0LgXWJE2MeLu=tQUmaz0WCRDPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.all@ietf.org, justin@uberti.name
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001e460005821e1aef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ek_Kl2A_16Q8U-Zh7KI6K9xbuFQ>
Subject: [rtcweb] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:58:09 -0000

Reviewer: Menachem Dodge
Review Result: Has Nits

This document has "Intended Status" for the Standards Track but the
document is written as an informational guide. I suggest  that the ADs
decide whether this is informational or for the Standards Track.

On the whole the document is written well and is understandable.

In Section 5.2 it states that:

  "Mode 1 MUST only be used when user consent has been provided. The
details of this consent are left to the implementation; one potential
mechanism is to tie this consent to *getUserMedia *consent.   "

I'm not sure what "getUserMedia consent" refers to.

While the document defines that Mode 1 should be used when there is user
consent and Mode 2 should be used when there is no User consent , however
when should Mode 3 and Mode 4 be used?

The document also states that:

  "Future documents may define additional modes and/or update the
recommended default modes. "

If this is the case should there be a "version" defined so that the webRTC
client and Server no which implementation has been implemented?

Thank you kindly,

Best Regards,
Menachem