IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Does RID require the same ext id for all the m= sections?

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 26 September 2017 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFC91330B2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kE9Vuek_5_w4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA9F13432D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b195so11286282wmb.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kiO5skbfAiNCSGt8P4V0J/WN2Q28z9EwEjRVcHqziE=; b=TyOactSrQm1aQOr7Bd9MwrkduYNiZtgZJvcV8HWvEOHoTlj6keG/D+Vi/WHQgL/syt rHuWpqScU5qv38EdBySq0zM6XD6Gh7gxpGMSYXsMkXmdxMZK6cR325zHO09uktPwyJkr s66dvkb0421r4AzOo5KXRRQ5yiOu+YGrHZmgDH5voQ72a0Yqh61K13s1FlyPcsr9lS/H 2h8UGztmEsJ6/hk/9Sy8d7aVYW3aXC170m2Z8t6pOGSznji1gUvGpB1H+jmVn0IKePyf XIUN4YMvjh3RdWCgmvG5x+Q4I6Ifij9ADUOzGkAFIbFr7YNq4fRmCaRr3Perw3I6iK2a QoZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kiO5skbfAiNCSGt8P4V0J/WN2Q28z9EwEjRVcHqziE=; b=l8vo5dxsfHToWjEAP8dXJ+z2znsVGfQVHDab/b/Pqt1d/P57PJ4mLd6slEOq98r5lK dRcRq70ZAfBqsVJgOFo13C8nzfOCtGyQqrTuEf4skVLtdJVtB+JUg1hqJUGirOo5crd4 5dlIVZB2tOqwe+9nwdvzSNTU03cq1g4XemtJx1ZrPXklO3pfulCAoll+9CrE7nSjROMS urtxXD2u/06/V2ucvCWo1s5BKF4NA4t1atYPmOkcAUl+d+/W+Bpl1SEMWcpKFYnmjLji 64U5ngGwEmgqolh4OfcsuV4xUtjpE/ps+KALQbq5qyBhMvmkKnSxp938nT4ztPZKtMLv ro+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhOWgVoAQgBSwAuZs5SNaB7R5OQsuYWsKtjRwUv8Ig0KvfwEJLU DYa+uaF+vJKg+Nuo9rDOmaXkj0d/Dee82Sf96Iqi4g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDINXV98EMHafUI78cbD8xEhohOij2HbUBy2KgsgcN2chmmxLFwfi0No+mdWWUUsk1+cWMSepjwaRBXkQTV5NQ=
X-Received: by 10.80.152.33 with SMTP id g30mr18362470edb.49.1506454782672; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.214.6 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D5DC2A74.726EC%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <CALiegfnGvkdrhG_hPKGuGuhZCbcL9mUoauheBA3bc15s_G7ihg@mail.gmail.com> <EB2B7F8E-2847-4C8F-8DF4-5BAEE3C1DEE6@cisco.com> <CALiegf=6xRCXAx71XiErwqzwdVBVbFmzhvtaKS77v88Oh569TQ@mail.gmail.com> <881A3BC9-C9ED-4E1E-ACFE-C887333BB672@cisco.com> <CALiegfmerkkf85H_9AOOJq0_Hd=MDj1v_QguucCv6OdXRFqQkw@mail.gmail.com> <D5DC1C96.726D6%mzanaty@cisco.com> <CALiegfkB-DF2njWYzJYg455GddByLK8dQJq21wp+JEWSaJC=sQ@mail.gmail.com> <D5DC2A74.726EC%mzanaty@cisco.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:39:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfneUmxrbGRK619Q4Nqp=JutD6my0kueurZNt4W3fUnD2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/exXg_a_FZe7EVBe3Ub2qz95s3Ws>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Does RID require the same ext id for all the m= sections?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 19:40:02 -0000

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) <mzanaty@cisco.com> wrote:
> I found a restriction against aliases in 5285bis:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-14#section-7
>
>
> "... If an RTP header extension, i.e. a particular extension
> URI and configuration using <extensionattributes>, is offered in
> multiple m-lines that are part of the same bundle group it MUST use
> the same ID in all of these m-lines."

Thanks. I was not aware of that draft. Hope implementors go that way.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email