Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal avail on the webrtc list
Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 16:10 UTC
Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9B721F8AE1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.391, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Toy6kmslRQeC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C799721F8ADE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywa6 with SMTP id 6so8108224ywa.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.4.170 with SMTP id l10mr1153383pbl.3.1317226374015; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e3sm9000927pbi.7.2011.09.28.09.12.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so21801147pzk.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.11.138 with SMTP id q10mr45144205pbb.37.1317226372130; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.43.229 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <545388B3-3189-4291-BD1D-52898B888F3E@phonefromhere.com>
References: <545388B3-3189-4291-BD1D-52898B888F3E@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:12:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxt_3bnODVCWxrrrKVWO3R3Or1FjhMOHwgUzq3-h6dW0LA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec5314ad1ffe8f404ae02a92e"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal avail on the webrtc list
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:10:25 -0000
Few questions that I have in regard to this: 1. How can you get local codec capabilities to implement something like SIP OPTIONS? 2. Can you specify multiple stun/turn/turns servers? If you do what is the candidate generation process? On the same note why do we provide both stun and turn relays? Isn't turn server is normally stun server as well? 3. How do you process multiple answers for the same dialog? 4. What do we do with multiple answers from a forked dialog? Is it even supported? 5. What is the process for synchronizing audio and video streams? _____________ Roman Shpount On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> wrote: > I just want to ask folks to take a look at a proposal Neil Stratford wrote > for the > Low Level Javascript API and sent to the webrtc list. > > It is based on his and my experience of web based audio plugins and on a > proposal of Cullen's a while back. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2011Sep/0106.html > > We'd appreciate any feedback either here or on the webrtc list as > appropriate. > > Tim. > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Roman Shpount
- [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal avail … Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] Low Level Javascript API Proposal av… Saul Ibarra Corretge