Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
Gerard Fernando <gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk> Thu, 14 March 2013 00:24 UTC
Return-Path: <gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B145D21F8614 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-G3gyFfkfJe for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm24-vm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm24-vm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [212.82.109.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E56321F860A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [212.82.105.224] by nm24.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2013 00:24:35 -0000
Received: from [212.82.108.239] by tm20.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2013 00:24:35 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2013 00:24:35 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 230912.32085.bm@omp1004.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 85450 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2013 00:24:35 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1363220675; bh=CgR3WP/rKMMwMy9MmYn9ROP7FNgQP3hWzqAsJmMl1F8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y+KW2w4I5U7CBtpYnAGbmb22hjR5Ei17b0LoE3niPaCi+veNjKrkPF097aj+WgYvBa4yyI4Fr9DKVQyWVBvpXnPf4KDrjjLi/2SNECSmZCSP3AVF8icYss0REI7P2bQrD2zJ+2tb5u8LqhWJDzf+S8oFpXhfmvbiScDtxMW2NSA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q/sz0cuAg67WuFuNlnJtDOJqS62iD8DwKo1/3k/9oVXrI+Mejcjiw2vUfEd2JxfSIBAIfZ2TAlx6Ht/kmFi+SBDY/LO0yz7mZscM2eeKU9W6LPXm7SKDOSICmwX4ADhqcQ+QVVVlrdkY3dL3FYcVmnTvF07gGVsNy7qp5Hrp8GY=;
X-YMail-OSG: JsF0FBAVM1l2moytQALH5cLt1Ar_NLdHcNrjg5VEki0cClz Jf9OWJYWOcQcNCWyqDztDFSjxOyTNztZlaG6nrus0iIhLJYTBh7a1S.ul2.9 NtRUxvlA65sy2OdlcyH6w1zf4yCFfLGfGDRPNAC918FOuydhGaA0G19C5rbl h8rQEvxsr06OoRAUfT_0KPbU1mQQFd243DQECBuK2chDm2Zp1f2r_15NBEsB 3g8idBg3L30nHyPYqYk9VmFwkL5Ytc3zMkt1DxuAx1gEBuS8TLgPoQubsMAu JLxdtq0p.xqq.rvtWz8wMu.R3Je3m_dNb6ZXO3AEd9N2JJ6Ox3px6ilj9Kv8 635b3g0xh.RDMuuYO1xqlIhW9PVAxEf7L3RGhTtO6jkFFs4Y41ZrubBJhl1b 1lLU1UwsIQrkxv0ziyUh2EQ6lghUE43lc4vSh3LtnEAA3fdi1E8jozKopQsL DI7ugPtsiJmtMJxUhlX7lBecRnuT0lJ.oY_G6p8E_FLYAJZf8P87MVUVySiN cXrN4ezeKOKh7C7on8m1qWK89jjhVMVxFS4bFvRZ1DqWV42La5ZyD.hn6HsB 6qMT5_..XjoV19TOO6A--
Received: from [99.113.35.251] by web132106.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:24:34 GMT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGVsbG8gWUssClRoZSBkaXNjbG9zdXJlIHByb2Nlc3MgaW4gTVBFRyBpcyBub3QgYmFzZWQgb24gd2hvIHlvdSBhcmUsIG9yIG9uIHlvdXIgQnVzaW5lc3MgbW9kZWwuCgpLaW5kIHJlZ2FyZHMKCkdlcmFyZAoKCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KIEZyb206ICJXYW5nLCBZZS1LdWkiIDx5ZWt1aXdAcXRpLnF1YWxjb21tLmNvbT4KVG86IFN0b2NraGFtbWVyIFRob21hcyA8c3RvY2toYW1tZXJAbm9tb3IuZGU.OyBCbyBCdXJtYW4gPGJvLmJ1cm1hbkBlcmljc3Nvbi5jb20.IApDYzoBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.137.519
References: <513F68C0.4010106@ericsson.com> <DD34B1B0-2C18-4081-81CC-584192CC726C@apple.com> <513F7745.3020302@alvestrand.no> <CBC4C75B-0397-4953-8C06-4E236DA15250@apple.com> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DE30E9C@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <AEDB506D-E350-4E14-B8ED-F2D07C16D57A@nomor.de> <8BA7D4CEACFFE04BA2D902BF11719A8331B17F22@nasanexd02f.na.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <1363220674.82166.YahooMailNeo@web132106.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:24:34 +0000
From: Gerard Fernando <gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "\"Wang, Ye-Kui\"" <yekuiw@qti.qualcomm.com>, "\"rtcweb@ietf.org\"" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8BA7D4CEACFFE04BA2D902BF11719A8331B17F22@nasanexd02f.na.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-586199313-1905388920-1363220674=:82166"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Gerard Fernando <gerardmxf@yahoo.co.uk>
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:24:37 -0000
Hello YK, The disclosure process in MPEG is not based on who you are, or on your Business model. Kind regards Gerard ________________________________ From: "Wang, Ye-Kui" <yekuiw@qti.qualcomm.com> To: Stockhammer Thomas <stockhammer@nomor.de>; Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com> Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013, 10:40 Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot > > How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR > > are > there? > > [TS] Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my > obligation/motivation to do so now? Speaking of the motivation part; that would depend on who YOU are and what kind of business model or plan YOU have in mind. BR, YK > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Stockhammer Thomas > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:53 AM > To: Bo Burman > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot > > > > How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR are > there? > > [TS] Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my > obligation/motivation to do so now? > > >>> > >>> We appreciate the need to have time to evaluate the specific words > >>> of the license statements that are forthcoming, and the need for the > >>> people who haven't made their IPR declarations over the last couple > >>> of years of discussion to do so within the next couple of weeks - > >>> but we do think that it is important to use the face to face time > >>> that we have here in Orlando to lay to rest any *other* issues than > >>> the licensing terms and other issues derived from Google's > announcement. > >> > >> I am not sure we can have a reasoned consideration of 'other issues > derived' > >> at such short notice. > >> > >> Look, I'd like our discussions and decisions to be informed and > >> considered, and there simply isn't time for either. > >> > >>> > >>> Harald > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> rtcweb mailing list > >>> rtcweb@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > >> > >> David Singer > >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rtcweb mailing list > >> rtcweb@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > > --- > Dr. Thomas Stockhammer (CEO) || stockhammer@nomor.de || phone +49 > 89 978980 02 || cell +491725702667 || http://www.nomor-research.com > Nomor Research GmbH - Sitz der Gesellschaft: München - Registergericht: > München, HRB 165856 - Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE238047637 - Geschäftsführer: > Dr. Thomas Stockhammer, Dr. Ingo Viering. > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agend… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Coban, Muhammed
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Stockhammer Thomas
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Wang, Ye-Kui
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gerard Fernando
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Wang, Ye-Kui
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Wang, Ye-Kui
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Rob Glidden