Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012

Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com> Sat, 18 August 2012 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <xiphmont@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E2221F84CF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrlsalQKrn0v for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A1C21F847D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eekb45 with SMTP id b45so1284178eek.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CMImYYYjhgT5c502aVbIz4lV1dRG6P3CkNknWtLvYJg=; b=AgAGvEMNiANU9T+TK2hMMVei6gJjV7Z4cICcGznIu6IcOWUrfMlue3SODmblF3KlYd GGBC0Z9CQeHlBStjbdIKg6MV83TI12eRwDotsq8LMNABq2MHJJiY7X37FBPyuHyfUrcA 4XudOwy83HLBU4KnNAn2KYp0ixkSuwjMKK1mjv9ZGbD8csR8n9DOWpj19e98ymuSEXNy H/RCuncSF9hHhBejH7V9u86T8OCzDBSF1q9aQJMfExrSqQKtGBL26OZCHOllHRjneRwN A8xzRg+nyW8yQplJg4v/yy8nCGrFVPbIcy12rTRZMAZIdFRsv6SOS1pAsZvtaVQLjy6K BqEg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.224.4 with SMTP id w4mr2595761eep.21.1345325436273; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.183.136 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACrD=+-x2x5ibOe3tr38OzXdpXhXypxkzbRwwrc1O5v6JRDctg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDwPjg8OW_Km1oaue=b-=U1FPouKL82s7POR1zNRiWhfA@mail.gmail.com> <002801cd7d70$568c3210$03a49630$@us> <CACrD=+-x2x5ibOe3tr38OzXdpXhXypxkzbRwwrc1O5v6JRDctg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:30:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CACrD=+8yswF-44nJV=D0C3b261eTBRhr42Qc+h6r3Hrp8wvoQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:30:42 -0000

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> wrote:
>> To make my position clear. The WG should support both H 264 and VP8.

Actually, I realize I may have misread what you wrote; you said
'support' which I took to mean 'mandate'.  I assumed that's what you
meant, but it is not what you wrote.

Monty
Xiph.Org