Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EAE1A8912 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMnrV1VqKnie for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30B81A19E2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 10so8027383lbg.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9dOlHK2z8PotG7zJyMU0/AvvVLqDALThTzSGHBSpaDQ=; b=TaVTpQ6/jNRd9iKpVRaQEfqfOntvnC0XIS1n6Wy0YUVidrJ4hpBMmWiCN9dlIWCpys c0IWbRYwCYfemxUU5MWj8DzbZnq1ruCAz/kOhrQzXI0VU2Q9cL67mi5WaNXr1hj5fiov 5jzZ902IG/2A15nVWMX+caEHTphsQfu+neZUKl2f1M7mfCY9WiXEURmrCjw5PMkwEVWK /YcZHsyr3p8Xkaptfj5Su3hJlS6vy9A0eSgq7MIR80BBGU8yegA4lH/DxZzoheo/UVPn AK3IB85mFSznPaytWJcNVTdxL7/Xs0UNiyhp0M0V3ovqh9fkOHgRErJh5uuku4tNKrMI bVCw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.204.99 with SMTP id kx3mr38351145lac.53.1415735779123; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.215.33 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2339956982@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
References: <54611529.7010007@nostrum.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2339956982@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWpxo-FB_1U6MR3oa9A_MtSrhZoERjWx1u=bQY9Ng0vxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/fhre_aefuflO_2rmymSka_M13O4
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:56:25 -0000

On 11 November 2014 06:16, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>; wrote:
> Would we really go through the process to constitute a new WG just in order to debate whether there is "compelling evidence"?


I think that all we can do right now is try to establish what the
intent is.  Whether any future effort happens will depend on whether
there is sufficient will (and a venue) to have that discussion at that
time.  We can't predict that that will happen, so I don't think that
there is much value in spending a whole lot of time on the subject.
Getting the text of a statement like this precisely right is going to
be tricky, but I suggest that we give Adam a little discretion in
producing it.