IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 06 August 2015 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0F51B2F23; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S4X362GDVKKd; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A191B2F1F; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DB0BE53; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:17:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mhoMEWy7xTr; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:17:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2890CBE4C; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:17:35 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1438867055; bh=Xr3WCyjsSkUjOJEAYH4+g+xAYWResvQLNtnZFB462Mo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hOWGuYrMMY7B6dVTEn/kh+gIs337XRoVZ47awvejAd+hj1ksE0RNtWNzSOoZOuNAG TEIklE/K+bwm9Ra4PblyVnvQLNcvfr84LPYH/k3oIMSFjvQvIH9+8r6fLr5d74DisS kVeEvIGpC0MottoGLDGobpSxtuFFf66tJ7tcx4yA=
Message-ID: <55C35E6E.6000206@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:17:34 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <20150805130607.20844.70680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B348E9691@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAErhfrysUBDS_RQQfoQSXkbGQv33j7Tmvvkgxf-gOVV6MzuwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErhfrysUBDS_RQQfoQSXkbGQv33j7Tmvvkgxf-gOVV6MzuwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/fl1SQ-ojTp9hfWstjTRmS2bQwow>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.shepherd@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness.ad@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:17:38 -0000


On 06/08/15 09:34, Xavier Marjou wrote:
> Some newcomers think that STUN messages only happen in cases 1 and/or 2,
> they forget case 3. Maybe this explains the misunderstanding.

Yep. So I think the action is on me to go back and pick out the
bits of text that imply a server is needed, or say I tried and
they're not really there:-)

I'll get to that tomorrow.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email