[rtcweb] Time allocation for video codec MTI (Re: DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 06 March 2013 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A3821F8D10 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:47:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZE3LpGSauYj for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30A421F8D0D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E34F39E05D; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:47:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e7B+3N2TZpA2; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:47:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [] (unknown []) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85BC539E03A; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:47:16 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <51378121.5010908@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:47:13 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMALouyyzN4dcGdF92TO2HGcBHbHR6fvHg7QC-x5ndCGjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMALouyyzN4dcGdF92TO2HGcBHbHR6fvHg7QC-x5ndCGjw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Time allocation for video codec MTI (Re: DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:47:23 -0000

(this may be a repeat, but I can't find the other mail)

On 02/27/2013 06:49 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Video Codec                       10:15 to 11:30
> 1. draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-01 (15 mins)
> 2. draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-01+draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-01+draft-marjou-rtcweb-video-codec-00
> (25 mins)
>        Discussion (30 minutes)
>        Call the question (5 minutes)

Looking at what has to be presented, and the likelyhood of questions, I 
think a more reasonable (less optimistic) allocation of time for the VP8 
part of this discussion would be 15 minutes for presentations and 15 
minutes for clarifying questions.