Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C881A890A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QBwNYJxNC6dB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2C71A88FE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79da6d0000008c7-22-53f359e31c51
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 53.98.02247.3E953F35; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:06:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.136]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:06:23 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Thread-Index: AQHPt9HcUdxHfr02BkWcgRGKgtn5xJvX+z2w
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:06:22 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupikeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3RvdJ5OdggynfOSw6JrNZrP3Xzm7R ONfOYse5CSwOLB5Tfm9k9dg56y67x505H1g9liz5yRTAEsVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVcXXJfuaC cxEVzbM/szcwzgjrYuTkkBAwkfg4czMzhC0mceHeerYuRi4OIYGjjBITzl9lh3CWMEp0vX4K lOHgYBOwkOj+pw0SFxGYwChx5dt6sG5hgUCJrfvns4PYIgJBEt9+7WWEsI0kZs5cBBZnEVCV 2LHzPFicV8BXYuvGaSwgtpBAgMSS//fA4pxAc06eXQ9mMwJd9P3UGiYQm1lAXOLWk/lMEJcK SCzZcx7qalGJl4//sYLcJiGgJDFtaxpEeb5E79e5LBCrBCVOznzCMoFRZBaSSbOQlM1CUjYL aBKzgKbE+l36ECWKElO6H7JD2BoSrXPmsiOLL2BkX8UoWpxaXJybbmSkl1qUmVxcnJ+nl5da sokRGHkHt/y22sF48LnjIUYBDkYlHt4HbJ+ChVgTy4orcw8xSnOwKInzLjw3L1hIID2xJDU7 NbUgtSi+qDQntfgQIxMHp1QD4/Qi/6Vl2u69VZYNXMunzWl8q5draPzI6wW72aY9tQ0lIV+m zF+kFL8hseFxx4dXkfrTWcQ+x3tOXrt/1c/59+2tE3fvdshd+ubVEvtzy/i73WYs3W+74b7M DrnSmZdDfp3Y8HhnzOMpajLXp6THcExeYmC1XWBrfJ/Nr+S7xqnOS57N+OYw5Z4SS3FGoqEW c1FxIgBgMfK4nQIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/g3iBP8L1sPhmzXB8Dew8JLp6wIc
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:06:32 -0000

Hi,

The draft says:

“WebRTC endpoints are required to support full ICE as specified in
                section 3.4 of [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-transports].  However, when WebRTC
                endpoints interwork with other endpoints that support only ICE-lite
                (e.g., gateways) those endpoints will not generate consent checks,
                but just respond to consent checks they receive.”

The draft also talks about “WebRTC implementations” and “WebRTC browsers”.

We need to make sure that the terminology is aligned with draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview (for example, draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview does not talk about “WebRTC endpoints”), which also may be impacted based on the outcome of the current terminology/gateway discussion.

Regards,

Christer


From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Hardie
Sent: 14. elokuuta 2014 18:10
To: rtcweb@ietf.org; Sean Turner; Cullen Jennings
Subject: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

This starts a WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness (available at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness/).  Please review the document and send comments to the list by September 10, 2014.
thanks,

Ted Hardie