IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 30 July 2013 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E4211E80F4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KqOeYF-LPwJD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com (mail-qc0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5378011E81D4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id j10so1019602qcx.39 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=znSIqnWZU7zzIamj/5pdNawPjEnErNxtHrxKwsu3OG4=; b=erSaKlgMPL7hQ+C2ZVidiiwrdKwqSsav1yyVeXY+KIUV2k6eaObWV3tb+ASuoN3cjL 1ea3omnkzJrS6Hrfvd96DcYi0PCzx7IdkM/tIreQCLjM1b2RCwsfjm08PxhiUPZdUja4 rFgV3GxhckDr3hWd1lBL356nTeAegp4TAncumWl1zQ9uYsjFHeLipXqqU8Hc7IrlZyue m/nchrdivAQz4ZtdVVfPEss5h+WSIVKYL/jS6+eAzRoaUDELjUakD4cYya7tz6+00bXW EX4vhqNex2EmT+ap7G8EmVDY2jpzctqhiyLvMIqj5N8VH8UdCo/cOF6NYsuxii8mH9vJ sl8A==
X-Received: by 10.224.182.79 with SMTP id cb15mr77511384qab.48.1375170529741; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.72.132 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4132BF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfnU0U0juKu8y68K-pfkdf9NwQPxH=yM7vt=1EZEg=fxtA@mail.gmail.com> <1375119910.76535.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CALiegfms3r7RSZ=nCH2fSFLnRxc8UjkL4F2d3evFs5XJOWmAbw@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4132BF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:48:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkRZHTSEfoAgfnn6vFHKgo8VwxwKnLJzkVxaXF=5ntK1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCu321uVDejVqn/kspVPLpz4l1gCXwxvMcN81CLD5cPwqTTKrL/k0zgQPG83yXmC7JNLhW
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:48:56 -0000

2013/7/30 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>:
> I was not wrong, but I was maybe unclear.

OK


> I meant that each entity would
> offer it’s m- lines as part of separate Offer/Answer transactions. It IS
> allowed to add m- lines in a subsequent Offer.

Yes, but that seems 100% unnecessary. The only we need is that peer-A
tells peer-B about its tracks and peer-B tells peer-A about its
tracks. We don't have that with SDP.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.13.0 | Report a Bug | By Email