IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663FF21F8A64 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zqc+3QCTziB3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8584821F8A66 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so76966gyh.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.144.7 with SMTP id r7mr308366ybd.35.1318899523154; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g38sm964671ann.4.2011.10.17.17.58.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnv1 with SMTP id v1so75963ggn.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.17.193 with SMTP id q1mr805507pbd.98.1318899520395; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.47.40 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <15B0E3AD-3086-499A-8E79-7AE58B3376C4@cisco.com>
References: <15B0E3AD-3086-499A-8E79-7AE58B3376C4@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:58:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvE77Fia1hVRhdmqnfsOExpdJq=J2VMwtsfB_7ztEYtLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec520ea436860f504af8839cf"
Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg <jonathan.rosenberg@skype.net>, rtcweb@ietf.org, public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Offer/Answer draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:58:45 -0000

Cullen,

Did we decide to explicitly not support forking which generates multiple
final answers? If this is not the case, how is this supposed to be
implemented using your model?
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> Jonathan and I submitted a new draft on setting up media based on the SDP
> Offer/Answer model. The ASCII flows are a bit hard to read so until I update
> them, I recommend reading the PDF version at
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling-00.pdf
>
> Clearly the draft is an early stage but we plan to revise it before the
> deadline for the IETF 82. Love to get input - particularly on if this looks
> like generally the right direction to go.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email