Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when"

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Thu, 14 November 2013 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0635211E81A3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:46:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.154
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.154 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.555, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0gfCGwVr6M91 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (mail-ie0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDA711E80F6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id ar20so2132221iec.33 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:46:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hxS1EUTznl47hNSF5pz909bb3YeU6/GR/AcYxjmpJGM=; b=j57Jd49RcCRxSWqQutODi9aMhPd8N9YLMtG5k6xZxFvSywxNUv75PsAm9kNdgDAd14 ZS1xy0A5yRMo4hmh9/ene4m/mwRrKt6PcpqXJm89y+tllpLcfNSxJcVnkFsXlvycauqe bobLXk9Kx+lFNEh7vJFBigS5xMvYfMf13pV3L4g6fKkasgUYZi4/f3f9qTg/D2Ut9vNZ RBUqyKmg04KmmbK4YgoS4QJIhAXnyeLdM6CK9L7mLe70zaRUicbmZtpBFNg5UfjwXkaz rE+c4pCi/daH8tnn91X733DxPl5oAQel0SIAYBij+66Zj+qk4Eld3vkZfeara8TafzLj hicw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3MAgt+1vDsAy99Rs7KH+x+tf6WcYZe8GQgBd+4osA2CnfilaTAnx65vvnr1BZ4Jf6GdG0
X-Received: by 10.50.176.137 with SMTP id ci9mr467640igc.31.1384411579755; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:46:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm34934662igh.0.2013.11.13.22.46.18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:46:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <528471AA.4060101@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:46:02 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <5282A340.7010405@gondwanaland.com> <20131113165526.GA13468@verdi> <5283E700.5090300@bbs.darktech.org> <CACKRbQf=x-wKUFemNhf4ZDwgZzqBFq=okUMw=BLCwaMmE7OJPw@mail.gmail.com> <5283FDF1.8030708@bbs.darktech.org> <D9D602D39A98E34D9C43E965BEC7439834E61DE3@nambx08.corp.adobe.com> <52845DB0.6040501@bbs.darktech.org> <5284626C.8050504@goodadvice.pages.de>
In-Reply-To: <5284626C.8050504@goodadvice.pages.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 06:46:32 -0000

Okay, so I stand corrected (thank you for pointing this out).

So, I guess my new argument is: WebRTC shouldn't support any less than 
Flash ;)

Gili

On 14/11/2013 12:41 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
>> Really? I've never seen a single P2P video chat app in Flash.
>
> You missed chatroulette and it's clones?
>
>>  What specifically does "P2P for real time communication" actually mean?
>
> See the slides from the 2009 MAX presentation.
> http://assets.max.adobe.com/files/307/P2P%20on%20the%20Flash%20Platform%20with%20RTMFP.pdf 
>
>
> RTMFP was and is in many ways alot more advanced than webrtc.
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb