Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Mon, 25 February 2019 04:10 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB477130EE4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:10:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eUuoRmeCWdyC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x129.google.com (mail-it1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213CC130ECF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x129.google.com with SMTP id z124so11377670itc.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:10:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aAV3WJCgvuTNJvc5iqBvZejxRNJWbzPflLmAE8iw/O4=; b=vQcUkGJAaiNa9gyI1HIgF/jHgK2tOyHrUDeaDnllIphzYzNl8iHFJxW5KUP+3s53pz Xo/sK8X3JY1RRQrHjj+gqs+H8og+0XSvkbwD8eV+d0ZYZPeM0pN8sAu+CkRVSn+6SbmH +XXrEx8lSrF7UC4129ShMfhK82Llhlv/7QsEsgCIBCl5kmqIxkTzM35FxQ5IekGaJuoP CVydcBfk/M6NzJ9CJJg90HMZRmy/vnUWW3O84VQ/322s0PdptLTeR8izakerdGG22ptO oURg42j972dITHdYas3f8fHpN8xbxKrtNEbAcgihoyCmh7fmgTxo42WnD6rcdqWNZ2fc 0W+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aAV3WJCgvuTNJvc5iqBvZejxRNJWbzPflLmAE8iw/O4=; b=ba5UUFcEe3c1HPYIsWtFzGz+mt4hZ5aYyEPmnFoAi3fS9vN5Pyj3FyBsNyBazcO+t/ 51+jxMLV1Xf7djWmvKZltqbcOxjC4zMkfVWrf8D5dSll059/wzD0LFrqJ8QmAAbRItAA lnPw8IDVDbAB4SqJIR6M85lpURz4wgvv8rRcvt27Yw/RutB8/QKovyOb6MgdKSVhGr4X D/pns+JxsKSSwSJ7ZLLqwJCtbYKsmxAc+uvFt7QtIkYH09datc11vNXi6sRx6PemFZHj XktBWJ9GkHOJm3npikCQlRhB14Ej+1/2ZHnBetCf7LtjmUPMoMqdhDmvu0i2GUkGZ0hf l5Mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubr8c/FNY4SkvyvXQGA4G/bHwDGjgHDFYFFx3omKYQArzQAQiOc vGD2Z3ZV9Ynt25rPxNOMg+YRX2YHFAqsGSa/RNlpnw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZpcbHVtwDZm736SJxcGQezAIQsf2WcYRR3K/cAsiMZfweqGMnSXU5x5rmS+UUJMf1IskLyrjgC2bNDfZ72t4w=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:ccc5:: with SMTP id x188mr8435558itf.123.1551067798919; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:09:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMDMMfEU2QE9AkPXsCgHp1gB=X6_-jAKvH6FsWhqNkV_Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2QLpD5Y5xdB1jKPS3uqsh7TMFFMR57YB1KTPTCcJ1F7w@mail.gmail.com> <0F9730B2-3E44-439D-9832-4C4AEBC054B5@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxvHWr2wPhzdT_v8mAgOVBC0E1DHfGMqBNCtyGBD-+0U-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2yHxAnzFsXFap=KgM8hWvOWksQVKnbO7UEfy475qURcg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-2yHxAnzFsXFap=KgM8hWvOWksQVKnbO7UEfy475qURcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:09:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2+vz=fiwqD_x8D5yeHdkkRJE8v6WbYAYxWa1kZGqGaFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002dd5ff0582b01d8b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/gZuxrt6EpjBYFfyBtvUHj87lrKA>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 04:10:10 -0000

Found a way to address this with minor changes to the existing PR.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:46 PM Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>; wrote:

> Roman, thanks for raising this. I looked into this a bit and it's kind of
> ambiguous; https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7850 uses "profile", "proto",
> and "protocol" (although "protocol" is used most frequently).
>
> JSEP actually uses both profile and protocol to refer to the transport,
> depending on the section; if we make a change here, we should hit all
> usages, which probably means that it is outside of the scope of this
> particular issue.
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:19 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>; wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> I did provide editorial feedback to the change on github:
>>
>> 1. This document refers to SDP protocol as profile. If you look at the
>> referenced documents that define "profiles" in JSEP, they all refer to them
>> as protocols. Also, in case of SRTP, profile is actually something
>> different and refers to SRTP key parameters.
>>
>> 2. Default candidate does not have profile (or protocol), it has
>> transport, port, and (connection-)address. So each "m=" and "c=" MUST be
>> filled in with port, protocol, and address to match port, transport, and
>> address of the default candidate for the m= section, as described in
>> ice-sip-sdp.
>>
>> Regards,
>> _____________
>> Roman Shpount
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:05 PM Christer Holmberg <
>> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Christer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *rtcweb <rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org>; on behalf of Justin Uberti
>>> <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org <40google..com@dmarc.ietf.org>>;
>>> *Date: *Saturday, 16 February 2019 at 3.57
>>> *To: *Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>;
>>> *Cc: *"rtcweb@ietf.org"; <rtcweb@ietf.org>;
>>> *Subject: *Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport
>>> parameter issue
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have updated this PR to incorporate minor feedback that was received
>>> during the consensus call. Those who had feedback, please take another look
>>> and comment on the PR if you are satisfied.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>>
>>> The chairs believe that there was rough consensus among those responding
>>> to make the change in:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/pull/863
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Given the state of the document, it will be the Area Director's call as
>>> to how much of the post-working group approval process must be re-done.
>>> Authors, please wait on his direction before publishing a new version with
>>> this merged.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ted and Sean
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>
>>