Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com> Tue, 17 April 2018 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631C512EB14 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zP8dQ3-hqGAC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22d.google.com (mail-wr0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0591D12EB0B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u11so34874705wri.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P1ko461rVuZGKcWzu6naTOWKD+8vfMaR8CfXDZMsSFw=; b=qC/+tK4kqL2JOiKNWPrfx670ZgqUloa/YHqA+2njEQX8eoDPYBcdle12D1IMSW1P8g xyOT8Hw5RcoOcllIK7UfveSWRxdyyDYo1TLtSEArbO51deEbZDyU6kv5VYHBDLXVHrWy 8fnCgPAxP3+vp/2UQjhfwEue4mbynuqCo4NwBBVXY4utvw1GmrmSxFsLFwRUQPD1agT3 NOr1j+fo9WvGZA8WmVvTNitsPptkdrdmErC8lSukss0zNG/Un/VI0jZ/W1KAyNHTNXM7 SijtywUdG7Avvn1QH+S+rlV10hPsKaC0uHF8eMRj9LcVyvMAlAStvYgFFhdhjiYxLYg0 +GhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=P1ko461rVuZGKcWzu6naTOWKD+8vfMaR8CfXDZMsSFw=; b=rnBgm9jJexot3oZ52Cl4H58Mfo5GNNM36YQYaZYQrYo5SUoV9PUhvzJXjgq9ggOYrH tUUcp48A2cj4QdTD0VGa3TVS4CcnqsbsCGidG4Hbgmfkzr+8EFxpUji052rFZARsIQyE Ira/wWnR4r1l8W2j1CJ7awQz06dokEDn16ItVd8s/KVM5F0MnRXZNafXsj2ARuebCGgb VtWFBLMoCIAFwfFuBLQtPvl9D/1m/NJlnbsQ44fPgsMppTRe6ziGOqC7rCbEqIQK8upQ 9psr+Y2lrWFR+lQ/iAnGMDU2j28Jqcg7h9fsKUzwnLuAY8CkX+lzrvXfyXbQPE1tgdCu sRYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBxkmTWvckXdht20TDqedqoIaWf2cTbX4bi5Kqr7naxNljpf6rC HMumWrj1RsjXCFNQCziW7uYtFA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+QjYuaYpEae78jqJyR67O1BpGWr0zMBRbO2GEFqBBJaQYkRrvIJdZpG7vwpffoeE0AkRF+rw==
X-Received: by 10.80.241.154 with SMTP id x26mr2825385edl.59.1523967362258; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2003:cd:6f24:eb00:5dbf:b9ae:ee71:ab49? (p200300CD6F24EB005DBFB9AEEE71AB49.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cd:6f24:eb00:5dbf:b9ae:ee71:ab49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm8640418edc.85.2018.04.17.05.16.01 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <1D5B431C-801E-4F8C-8026-6BCBB72FF478@sn3rd.com> <0dee004d-159a-a9be-a0b8-ecbfd4204d72@gmail.com> <06252a76-f12e-4d8d-4a07-5240a7605bce@gmail.com> <914e0220-e3cc-00d7-0925-e5deb8b07e75@nostrum.com> <AFDFD3F3-4798-4716-B26C-A67457BF2C65@sn3rd.com> <e5e2a517-d29a-117c-ab79-6f01fa62b843@gmail.com> <20180412144158.44733ac7@lminiero> <b767da79-7678-2a1c-ecb0-46a9a3bd9129@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2gmxpsGp=25pcJmnkYmipZdCFOqU4nLtAVSznLsZo9rQ@mail.gmail.com> <4902F7BF-0D20-4EA6-9E78-D22C90EFCE22@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-3NsqD6pq-kkMw81+2n_D8qf558CKeCE76ZypyxwCgs9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2NJ1vhVUerZ1cn8MP9hD_vgAYBurjeQKMx76Aa_U=n=Q@mail.gmail.com> <A8B32C11-30BD-4DA8-9BAB-FA26747BFF66@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-0VNCjGdhtz56jwwksBcfPk=9wuxfMgwi8mq7ViFyWpuw@mail.gmail.com> <DDEE408B-B49E-465E-B17B-C2813AF4F2F4@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-26f1hrujtegK6_U50E0MZPy5zmf0yDUWBY5oqrKQmGQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2fn-SdR2VUbVVHbMB-_Rw9gV0nsRnc2Ace+682LBJBag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <bb776fd0-b345-5362-3a46-744308b6c5b7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:16:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-2fn-SdR2VUbVVHbMB-_Rw9gV0nsRnc2Ace+682LBJBag@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/gkrN46YMIQF_QzLiDBAJy3UScKw>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:16:07 -0000

On 16.04.2018 23:06, Justin Uberti wrote:
> Here's a specific and minimal proposal, which is a slight modification
> of Sean's
> proposal in https://github.com/juberti/draughts/pull/98/files:
> 
> *The details of this consent are left to the implementation; one potential
> mechanism is to tie this consent to getUserMedia consent. Alternatively
> implementations can provide a specific mechanism to obtain user consent
> where needed, e.g., when a VPN is in use.*
> 
> Are folks in favor of:
> a) the text above
> b) Sean's proposal (without the boldface)
> c) something else

Voting for b).

Cheers
Lennart