Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 29 January 2014 09:12 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30C51A037D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBxG_ti9X59X for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88AD1A0364 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:12:47 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f038e000005d01-2a-52e8c60b78fd
Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7E.F5.23809.B06C8E25; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:12:43 +0100
Message-ID: <52E8C60B.4020709@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:12:43 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements@tools.ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <52D7E69C.2000405@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <52D7E69C.2000405@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Rpfn2Isggx8drBabb05itFj7r53d gcljyZKfTB5fLn9mC2CK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mrov3GPqeCvWMWuY/1MDYxLhLoYOTgkBEwk dh5g7GLkBDLFJC7cW88GYgsJHGKU+P1ZoYuRC8hezijx7WAPE0iCV0Bb4t2pFrAiFgFVifcv 5oHF2QQsJG7+aASLiwoES9ya9oAdol5Q4uTMJywgg0QEVjBKbJjyFiwhLBAocah5JyPENm2J b33/wQZxCuhITN/1kgXiOHGJnsYgkDCzgJ7ElKstjBC2vETz1tnMMK0NTR2sExgFZyFZNwtJ yywkLQsYmVcxsucmZuaklxttYgQG5MEtv1V3MN45J3KIUZqDRUmc98Nb5yAhgfTEktTs1NSC 1KL4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjMy5V68o3VeMcONST5evmC7dvy++K+N5yuPHyz6Jcd7zDLl9OKlB 6P/lnWv+2k9NbutfYdzocH9/jqPEnT0n21+mH7sWfbH+0oNvDO+Kjv28lHMvS+ettVXYr74T PnrWz6rzdqjxVN/8ciHmY6yK3LIN26W47316onzQ0/N3a7cb46ypFxrNE5VYijMSDbWYi4oT AW7s0z4WAgAA
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:12:50 -0000
WG, I haven't seen any feedback on this. I will leave it to the authors choice if they think what I suggest are just clarification or changes. If they are changes to what is required then I request that they seek WG confirmation and if that is not provided the comments are rejected. Cheers Magnus On 2014-01-16 15:03, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > Hi, > > As part of preparing the Doc shepherd write-up I have reviewed the draft > and have the following comments and suggestions for improvements. > I have to note that I found violations of formal requirements in this > documents. So these are all suggestions for improvements. > > > 1. After the WG last call this draft implemented half of my suggestion > of making clear what additional requirements use case resulted in. > However, it didn't implemented the part where I suggested that on the > first occurrence of a requirement, the full requirement text needs to be > included. I note that also Mary Barnes commented on the current format > making things hard to read. > > 2. Abstract: > Requirements on the browser functionality are derived from use-cases. > > Shouldn't there be a "the" before use-cases in this sentence? > > 3. Section 3.3.8 title: > > Simple Video Communication Service with sharing > > Isn't simply having sharing in the title a bit unclear? Shouldn't this > be "Desktop" or "Application" sharing? > > 4. section 4.1: > F26 It must be possible to move from one network > interface to another one > > I think it is unclear what shall move in this requirement. Wouln't it be > clearer to state this like this? > > F26 The communication session must survive across a change of the > network interface used by the session. > > Cheers > > Magnus Westerlund > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > -- Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-ca… Magnus Westerlund