Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 26 November 2013 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFD51AE04C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:38:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tttW5_8KsQbf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6201AE045 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D860ABE61; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:38:26 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQGyiuquWaeA; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:38:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.46.23.183]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3F56BE60; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:38:25 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <529530F1.6040108@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:38:25 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <529528C0.40200@bbs.darktech.org> <52952B71.4090208@cs.tcd.ie> <CABkgnnWc-0jg6GtQUWFYfAQWdOfdpNhdWVJa_yfB=VYePrdsAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWc-0jg6GtQUWFYfAQWdOfdpNhdWVJa_yfB=VYePrdsAw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:38:32 -0000

On 11/26/2013 11:22 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 26 November 2013 15:14, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> This WG could well select some
>> ciphersuites that you like better
> 
> DTLS doesn't use RC4.  It's a little tricky dealing with a stream
> cipher in datagram mode.

Sorry yes, I meant that even if rtcweb don't like the generic
BCP stuff that TLS (or UTA) does, for (D)TLS this wg can always
pick its own preferred ciphersuites.

S.

> 
>