IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-turn-rest-00.txt

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 10 July 2013 04:40 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26EB21F84D4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xWq6txFphtr for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E311311E8112 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hj3so5890047wib.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=LT14DDpnssTVi0/wfNFbCoED7T+rxtLMu6PCYX+iNn4=; b=DJgzVhxUlCxJnc/MsBYMpkkFIGGeS5+rj6EhmZHLRVsCaH1fN7b949T//HJIXI6F6V zjmkolRA+dGxcCp+WNRJTeDRAsYc5rPk6kGdiUC8GzGEi/4BSbfo4W5TTnfBnahNnmg/ I8cZR3+evmPUX7ioW2BOWcKZMJmkkDkTuxyhOmfU7V3JvuD2zbuEs72c87EefM116xCO HZEegqOaPR/y/sPvrjgf7mcfhMwVtVK20Rm+SOQhr9XsJtQxh/0giST78fZXDCYIVjxr 2Yt3xl/s5NVDyBRZldnPbwy6rmNav9QX8zWwrRuR3daZ06oikpWXGu2XxbXOyzNn43lH y+hA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=LT14DDpnssTVi0/wfNFbCoED7T+rxtLMu6PCYX+iNn4=; b=m++itLJuk6fgDLXVtsZFwnjLqaTXDQizsCD8BlNFCkSbAmb2N42CJmRsYmpc/ZQWJI mM8GnCpg6DQZuQcFDPl9ecCDQoTNoFSE9PZgHxxtSEurAl31SnFlgmtcTWRkdEtARQ+f ryeazoYtEPJ0PmipLGB3ye8ZLV5MvkznVFklOna5daG1wAk55aUEuixzq+dkOfdpcOaO 524CZ7MutotmyXiBdmfsn3vSU2JTKUj69DG9bE7ntsdcBbkufe0A0QO2mTkHruwPbyRH 1QLppFY8L5paJS7m9sHDLbu98eSbKIjYqh8qxGSqP9GsfJtQbKhdJ3exrjQFS5Ce20ie 4G5Q==
X-Received: by 10.180.211.233 with SMTP id nf9mr16070317wic.41.1373431206835; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.62.113 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51DB3443.6070301@nostrum.com>
References: <20130708041540.7930.93762.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zAs-NCJgiiHuFHi1ZEOdp2SB4v2-0AYrxBQ2R_gJ=nLcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0Vxkf-4j-ZHCisKuORob_cL3ogXoexTFMDMJDEttRbaQ@mail.gmail.com> <51DB3443.6070301@nostrum.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:39:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0XT2HUJxgF5upx-Q7dwQ_-xskVPk9yKrbSaiqjzpg+eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c338d035177904e120df12"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmG+qORyq6vYaIIkV+7gWBNVHAvY3eStGMLFkvwUfybIcttaZpBX2lPsMdYzzzlL85J66QlGNVGFOPUXQaZ9m/DpVP7njFL6Mg8jCXVHxZ2IMOvB8ZfluXyD0aE1PCj7mlpuP6P6GmD2XH85eJ9opgDlkXvdfa8PSONgq3k8h/NwJtPq7XGMPYC0dTbj3kBbTg/8KGr
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-turn-rest-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 04:40:08 -0000

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 7/7/13 23:24, Justin Uberti wrote:
>
>> Just uploaded a 00 version of a spec for requesting time-limited TURN
>> credentials for WebRTC apps. Would like to get 10 minutes of agenda time to
>> present this in Berlin.
>>
>
> Thanks for getting ball rolling on this, Justin. I agree that this is an
> important mechanism to have defined.
>
> I only find one issue in my initial read through the document: why are we
> proposing the use of HTTP POST for stateless, idempotent information
> retrieval? The key benefit of this approach is that it doesn't actually
> create state in the network. That's a much better fit for GET.
>
> Compare RFC 2616, sections 9.3 and 9.5, and see if you don't agree.


I originally had this as a GET and switched it to a POST for basically the
same reasons that Martin outlined - it wasn't completely stateless, and two
different requests would return different usernames (because of new
timestamps). But if these concerns are overall insignificant, I would be
more than happy to switch back to GET.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email