Re: [rtcweb] API draft: draft-kaplan-rtcweb-api-reqs-00

Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org> Fri, 21 October 2011 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dan-ietf@danyork.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC6221F8A6C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMSnxNoKHC+G for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E1A21F8A4B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qadc10 with SMTP id c10so1390562qad.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.194.130 with SMTP id dy2mr9193088qab.42.1319201534250; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc-00141.lodestar2.local (cpe-66-65-247-87.mass.res.rr.com. [66.65.247.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em9sm14961994qab.10.2011.10.21.05.52.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8CF04BE9-A277-471D-B41E-AD2AA2F8598F"
From: Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org>
In-Reply-To: <8E91C7B0-CE22-4CDA-8AC2-707EA5DA7716@acmepacket.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:52:11 -0400
Message-Id: <6C3AA182-89FB-4CD9-ABD1-7653A8C9AEE1@danyork.org>
References: <8E91C7B0-CE22-4CDA-8AC2-707EA5DA7716@acmepacket.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] API draft: draft-kaplan-rtcweb-api-reqs-00
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:52:17 -0000

Hadriel (and your co-authors),

Excellent document!  Thanks for taking the time to write this.

Dan (not-ranting-today)

On Oct 21, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:

> 
> Howdy,
> we've posted an initial strawman for "API requirements" for "no signaling" as our chairs have asked for for the con call.
> I'm still not sure why we need to provide this in an I-D, but given only a few days notice and having other day jobs, we've tried our best in the short timeframe.
> 
> Note: given the announced conf call for Friday (today?), I've submitted this version without getting final proof-reading from the other authors.  So some new bits I wrote they may not agree with... in fact some bits I wrote *I* may not agree with, given how late it is at night for me (well I guess early in the morning technically).  Caveat emptor. :)
> 
> Link details below.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-rtcweb-api-reqs

-- 
Dan York  dyork@lodestar2.com
http://www.danyork.com/   skype:danyork
Phone: +1-802-735-1624
Twitter - http://twitter.com/danyork
--------------------------------------------------------
All comments and opinions are entirely my own and have no connection whatsoever to any employer, past or present. Indeed, by tomorrow even I might be disavowing these comments.
--------------------------------------------------------