IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 11 July 2014 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797601B29E6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmPPOVoJBf0w for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79901B29D8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x12so1359049qac.21 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=x6SHmTnyqZsNg6fPB9I3XPNBYNYMhdaUoMhRs+/eNnM=; b=KzFrrRcfKjSGHqnaiXQHzKGFPO1Ml1BIS/exjqsKN5ZR2AKLh5K8LGBz2NbkJb0ZO7 ZwrBwOZLz50DfuUO9TGtILQR2hdq5/kxwfZat8zIpVCs/d0mKZT1tozzEJkokavWf7F4 CICCEPPwK2OCZMTqdAbVSpSRuDZsil7H4N499GkmSm3C1Dh+XcE42t4mAwkVD4Gb1YVu 0C1QOUTjwL3+zr7bVMNiTHxqUGXPJlb8wI/e9d5mvfa1tSxMuOXrpI3jpQAiZUxn1oGp 4G5vBHqZXYONl/ZGxYg5vxa0HsnhecyGxVnKp3u/ydrbLm4jHNsFJBoLVpUBN7LswlLa 8i+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4jWcZGeRlyosTsMKRZZAc28ijxlDhAjTZCAT2Gg/b2tsxlMY5+dqRFA2MNNyLB3PbpQ99
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.126.66 with SMTP id b2mr156296qas.99.1405116377154; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.234.161 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.234.161 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-3pFtKJPggXDXcDTjGH12b-61NnhdBTLvwpoV2b=RiOVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3fWP0q2O58FirSYcV3Ldai4TcRoBQg7nDx4OTPc_evrA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfke27BGRQc-HhZnQRHZWJfPzYjGf+spSdn_yh-Wb87NjA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-21TXrhV7mPpt2rzm6oQOCifNOphm8FqFo2-t+Nis497Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsQpfzyNrYiTfYJHk-D+ZQwC3TmHNVxXhuLNQQyCdYJmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3pFtKJPggXDXcDTjGH12b-61NnhdBTLvwpoV2b=RiOVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:06:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfmLR4rV10UsghY1bRE4DU3t0Bh2t-xrH2Vq5uB1BV1L3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2f98e875c3c04fdf226a3"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/hHUajHENAQVb7_IGAjWdIkd0ow8
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:06:36 -0000

Agreed. Imagine a future RFC defining
a=ice-option:no-regular-nomitation-support so Chrome does not understand it
and thus... uses regular nomination...

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>
On Jul 11, 2014 8:43 PM, "Justin Uberti" <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> Chrome doesn't do that. I think that behavior is harmful and is going to
> be changed in ice-bis.
> On Jul 11, 2014 1:26 PM, "Roman Shpount" <roman@telurix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, Chrome always uses aggressive nomination unless ICE Lite is used.
>>>
>>>
>> What about the cases when it sees unknown "ice-options" attribute? This
>> should make Chrome use regular nomination as well.
>> _____________
>> Roman Shpount
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email