Re: [rtcweb] WebRTC service between SPs

Moises Silva <moises.silva@gmail.com> Fri, 28 June 2013 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <moises.silva@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A027F21F9BCE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iDV0ctua5Zzx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922DC21F9BC2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f4so4673378iea.39 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=avTjdAqgWNIiy7gX7IHIIHbcq/LHivok59OqPG6dcqg=; b=cfQR9pqQlpCa6eyn5UQvRSwH72EnJAHHd4dE/WdqNMUZ2OYu1eS3lOoe7949ucQDxc kh2hmtdZiENZPowYbz165glAjIkYyWVvK+4PRdWgrkQ0eZH5AGXa/8ay0bUoKAYmTq+J mxrCx3UgmdwZiQO7IUYcJoOOgb1HnJh6+Fjkqc199utZ0RiYOeKp9OdAzh/V1/nfFnkH AN5FeUXCogSiCGa4DjpJWH/WuZTIJHY66pnqOUBsjpLkhf4cSz+zY3mwPmt3pmYFKJXM BF7ADkBvnNDpbUHkdE0brej2LJEeuiW53rfomjnaNqNHOk6tsbZNOxl/q15hxOfXzKiy UjKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.87.71 with SMTP id v7mr5267321igz.29.1372443913844; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.130.66 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281052E6B@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
References: <034C870DB898BE43B5787C7A79107CD94BFA4E1B@nkgeml507-mbx.china.huawei.com> <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281052E6B@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:25:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA4nhyCLd_JGdGaqGFN3e5qi7eDy4yLVdpSLYU76HCa4AmcUUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Moises Silva <moises.silva@gmail.com>
To: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0103ef52f5a28804e03affa2
Cc: "Wangyahui \(Yahui\)" <yahui.wang@huawei.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WebRTC service between SPs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:25:17 -0000

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>wrote:

>  As I understand it, it’s not just a problem of identities.  WebRTC does
> not define the signaling protocol, but leaves it  up to the application.
> If two users download their applications/JavaScript from the same site, it
> won’t be a problem, because the same application is handling both ends of
> the call.  But if one user is on site A while the other is on site B, there
> is no guarantee that either site’s application will understand the
> signaling from the other.****
>
> **
>

Unless websites agree to use something standard such as SIP/Jingle for
federation (inter website/domain communication).

-
Moy