Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)

"Ravindran Parthasarathi" <> Wed, 19 October 2011 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D28F11E80B0 for <>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.645
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.346, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nt8dVuTEAxMg for <>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BB111E808A for <>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9JMY1VR031101; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:34:01 -0400
Received: from ([]) by with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:33:27 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:03:20 +0530
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)
Thread-Index: AcyOrG9mRI3/s77xQ2ibO9k250+sVQAAcKUA
References: <><><> <> <> <> <> <>
From: "Ravindran Parthasarathi" <>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sa=FAl_Ibarra_Corretg=E9?= <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2011 22:33:27.0236 (UTC) FILETIME=[1EB2D840:01CC8EAF]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:33:31 -0000


I guess that you didn't get my point. In case you remove the earlier mail thread and reply inline to my last reply, the context of my reply is lost, we start discuss something which is not relevant to the original mail. 

BTW, Please note that it is nothing to do with my e-mail client or its settings.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé []
>Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:44 AM
>To: Ravindran Parthasarathi
>Cc: Iñaki Baz Castillo;
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser
>RTC trapezoid)
>On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:
>> Saul,
>> I have already mentioned in the mailing alias that *Please don't
>delete the existing mail* because we often miss the original intent of
>the mail and goes in the circular discussion.
>I quoted all your email and *properly* replied inline, instead of top-
>posting. The fact that your email client is not good enough it's not my
>> My original reply was intended only to answer Inaki query on how I
>come to the conclusion that "I'm not favor Inaki solution of SIP over
>websocket because it is overkill for signaling protocol".
>I know how to read. I'm just saying that no one wants SIP over WebSocket
>as a "default protocol". It's up to developers, like Inaki, Jose in this
>particular case, to decide what to use. They chose SIP over WS, you may
>use something else.
>Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
>AG Projects