IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] [tsvwg] Diffserv QoS for Video

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7E712D594; Fri, 13 May 2016 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjDZJiSQamuj; Fri, 13 May 2016 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205A312D59B; Fri, 13 May 2016 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=510; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463153961; x=1464363561; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=/xAPsaa3+hNi9W/GNRaM0SBRGdgJ2FAcLwJovVZmUUg=; b=V0CAtLyykOGR6aqYw6Boc+j025UEtomWIUEi36iEUkOzMbbZGEOjvWTt de1fS+0LGHO1n4PTLtefnELiUEMSHQpyfAu5/APiRarmgNfPO8J8p8qRb 0ZhcBoUjVl2mpb28SJ+JsHRIwQZ4IUJBoW9zRq2ydkoFcx84wc1WQs75Z M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BoAgBu9DVX/4kNJK1egzeBUwa5UAENgXaGEQKBLDgUAQEBAQEBAWUcC4RCAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIGB4QMiUCBA4FiCcIwRsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEciBsIgk+EP4Mrgi4BBJgnAY4dgVONRo9AAR4BAUKDbG6HW38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,614,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="271387147"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 May 2016 15:39:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4DFdKXa027006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 May 2016 15:39:20 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 13 May 2016 11:39:19 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com ([64.101.220.144]) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com ([64.101.220.144]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 13 May 2016 11:39:19 -0400
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de" <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Diffserv QoS for Video
Thread-Index: AQHRrS2dZ/47y6ykhEqiDL26Kx1AUA==
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:39:19 +0000
Message-ID: <986DFBC3-AE46-4D9C-8884-128047EF9777@cisco.com>
References: <828773FE19B05B4581311493A046E85E6ECC3084D0@HE111642.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <em88678e54-c513-4d74-8bbd-ba0785d70b36@sydney> <828773FE19B05B4581311493A046E85E6ECC4090FD@HE111642.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
In-Reply-To: <828773FE19B05B4581311493A046E85E6ECC4090FD@HE111642.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.165]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BC4871F5FC6F3845BE506D66F1011B1C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/i6E4UOi4z6AwV_-wkrZtT4wPewE>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [tsvwg] Diffserv QoS for Video
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:39:22 -0000

> On May 10, 2016, at 12:56 AM, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de wrote:
> 
> I think we agree, that audio and video frames, if both are part of the same (interactive) media flow should be transported by the same PHB [PJ] or the same queue [RG]. 

I don't think we have consensus on that in the ART area but my understanding of this spec was that it allowed people that wanted to do that to give them the same and it allowed people that wanted to implement the different queues to do that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email