Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8

Basil Mohamed Gohar <> Mon, 04 November 2013 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB6F21F9E26 for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:49:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4iAnDvf+rR3 for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B958221E8267 for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C1E765A863 for <>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:48:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:48:52 -0500
From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <>
Organization: Libre Video
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <BLU406-EAS3033A38C2A9CA480AFFD3B93F40@phx.gbl> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 17:49:17 -0000

On 11/04/2013 12:32 PM, Hutton, Andrew wrote:
> On: 03 November 2013 20:20 Randell Jesup Wrote:
>> IANAPL (I Am Not A Patent Lawyer) - but if you make an image that
>> includes Cisco's plugin for imaging machines, that would be a violation
>> of the rules - you would be the one distributing it to end-use
>> systems.  While you're unlikely to get pinged on it, the company
>> lawyers may not see it that way, and it might show up flagged in an
>> audit, and IT guys don't like that.
> I also have a concern about this issue and made the same assumption however yesterday I was told by one of the Cisco experts that as long as it is the owner of the end devices (i.e. An enterprise) that is doing the distribution that would be within the rules. However IANAPL and those that are will need to examine the small print. 
> Maybe this is something that Cisco could clarify in the FAQ's.
> Andy

The problem is that, while on the surface Cisco's offer seems to solve a
major problem, in fact it poses so many unanswered questions or unclear
situations that it may not be a net gain.  No doubt, we have our
wonderful Western patent system to blame for this, but that is what we
have to navigate around.  If things are still muddy after this offer,
then we likely have gained very little, as that was the main complaint
against VP8 from the beginning.

Libre Video