Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 4941 support?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 21 March 2014 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C39B1A07C6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKil97OIuHgD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6D01A0A15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so817919wib.16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=o9NvoPl2EbWduyP1ZFbgow9/PIiaaW8kfrQf4ahOAMY=; b=yJCxM/vQS6jptQz4OhqBZt84Rz7NXglnwPPeeUj1Povm8LZRfnyIMhN0RzrR6zDCFW LwMx4Pf/ETCKhVyZHa25vU5SSMBNoAv1IW8g7a99KXUzM6jn8pKnj3EhzUUhEg7vNjMX 9WBBiVxcZ1a537GT4gInGV/v8o2DgSRAqeCPyiISQ9e60jSlfxCuPGs7clzX3OvSIRg8 5nUq/q0Bl3vDLpRgrPKm6dUz4YOcacXArMiKkBJc2JGtgAc35llxLr3GnDkGMv1BKI8I 0Vm1q5olYZczLwDKPZQIp/I9SbNeDVJ+/UjWvAWjrzYkS4kk35BSspZRFP9+ypV1REXW VPOw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.89.211 with SMTP id bq19mr4580198wib.58.1395429669892; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.147.10 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBQ=Otxq0vNgKQEoY6UmrEd73625vvBMr45h7MvJFS+Pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOJ7v-0Hw0NFs_avsB2Z8do21BCws2LRZSeSh6HP0t455SPXyw@mail.gmail.com> <B6836FFA-867A-4CBF-9855-D265425EC5E1@cisco.com> <CAOqqYVE=i2L7FxGgKuV0DVaaxYOPnxzSEbDoq0_4Tqapna575g@mail.gmail.com> <CD747481-EBDA-4FFC-A31D-618E6E217420@cisco.com> <5329B617.2070001@alvestrand.no> <17885A74-50A3-49E3-8C54-E53C55019C73@cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-0Dx4Owam7NzXqs6ALPi+ps9gKbmFK9=Zu5eBr9yHYgKg@mail.gmail.com> <444DE75E-BF07-4C6F-91B1-CF57DC67FBA3@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMD5jG-w7ahHLsUX9QMSkSMArS4Wz7ZYOucAZWkrmz5YsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1JZG547KkiWeG=3zfCFk6WVzm+r9kF0MTg3SQynHMJdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvKJRMYGYDRNKvmdxmsc35B16P4-+73E+o85-re42yrzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2hMHJUGhKKocvu5Ld9_cr+duSbJ=+rEucUaAmjiooZTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv5xHknbsPCYpysvo7CeA7oKFu+Yy7QJbmVd6s1UyLr7A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBQ=Otxq0vNgKQEoY6UmrEd73625vvBMr45h7MvJFS+Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:21:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVVO42QSVLEfZQ66Z+4eJ-J0vNs_2j8nUUKADRNUYGTjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/iEae2fAzMfhwvSPUH1zwwvR2T_s
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 4941 support?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:21:21 -0000

On 21 March 2014 09:07, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's actually not imaginary in enterprise contexts, as there are shops that
> disable temporary addresses to make tracking or other security activities
> easier.  Not my favorite reasoning, personally, but there you go.

Yeah, that's what super-cookies are for.