Re: [rtcweb] Pictures of congestion control on the Internet - which is more realistic?

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Fri, 02 May 2014 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CCF1A6FA3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 10:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J38mHhj7kjtc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2351A6FA9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 10:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x13so1359479wgg.19 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=53YWDneu6xkboJsvzcQ4rt+SsGZXbfAyA08+P12c4bU=; b=Ip3MrmuiR6b5XxQkjcZD8QMkJ3p5jwnH99LRkM7gBKmoDRBQB7hRbtaN4nApNki6e+ 2uNtZdSTOSL+RsrlVsak9oX7uL5wAnVlmS6L8Dv9xaeKViFQ9+DEV9q1xkW/lvYfKm60 JiRft7rlDtdMgscGAHiNkg9u8DudspHHcClyPYI0CxG45SLB5ghysR8IlG5xXuMa6cr+ qDlHRpA1cPaqfJem9Cj9l961VvfSf/fKdLN6RiCA4QQc2cPduRGOKl7eYYxusnyOm7dN wunyFsMFAB2oPZDntzo+QVnh9M6YzJj0vhzGiO5OC/x4Z+kuoYikUA3vBHHX3fIgQv9U yWbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLbit1Q1yi9pRt47KzQ5ksasdLAihMUA8/TRAhV3G0O/UoMW5T7gfCSQZvXdkqMVdMDQB9
X-Received: by 10.180.13.8 with SMTP id d8mr4023965wic.13.1399052941986; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nb8sm6192703wic.18.2014.05.02.10.49.00 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 02 May 2014 10:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id f8so2744747wiw.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.69 with SMTP id ck5mr4049544wib.15.1399052939977; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.181.136 with HTTP; Fri, 2 May 2014 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5363D9A8.5080801@alvestrand.no>
References: <5357B281.1030900@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxvpse7_aCTMNvvt6_LBMXMyXKWoSpOUnmXMTv-O0u8Kug@mail.gmail.com> <4A607E3C-B0A3-450E-863C-8E71C8EFC191@cisco.com> <28C7190C-B47A-4C31-9EA4-F55AD386507F@phonefromhere.com> <CAD5OKxtzaHGGB-97YY6PRVM=ZUf8fKycQgaKnNscR7UEtc-u0g@mail.gmail.com> <5363D9A8.5080801@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:48:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxstVm4CbHKSJmuEmWjF8yzUJcFPYsqHDaJT3b4rksFjAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30684739826be104f86e6500"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/iH1_fF9kDsH_WfM5YkDPKHcwdRk
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Pictures of congestion control on the Internet - which is more realistic?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 17:49:06 -0000

On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:

>  I'd put it the other way round - QoS helps (when it works), but rate
> adaptation is still needed.
>
> We might actually agree on what we need to do :-)
>

I am sure we agree :) We need both QOS and rate adaptation to get the best
possible communication connection quality.
_____________
Roman Shpount