Re: [rtcweb] Discussion on Congestion Control

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E1521F88B1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z+HdvCR3rIAg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B63421F88D2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaaq11 with SMTP id q11so941689eaa.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K9rT6W/eTGLSpTDKobAUFXzMTeSYGFrB2Z9VYXsl3U4=; b=AKD5jpoDEhrR7asgXlQ3XFgu1vn3G5PNu6WFNhKWnrU7zI/NMnhdndlXynGgjLa7cW IMJRinGesDh+wxWF8ApuMln9GU9y9UTy8rVaOpaZNkHNUSfCviTUzLiT89z9lL/TSkXt zEffqRbB+HNQQTFU7XRy6cUD9hr/k3s/L88ZaQXs+O1BkYqrkaz6s//Pkw8r+WlYvLzX Tis1FpHQp7tG0TriL7Re4PztbqHUR1k7fQtIb5NGBI5ZLSGa8zC5+Z4e6iiIzljAE2oj tyxLeu1bT+vQMhDxPaD8jrCtq8oA6Yh1Fd7eOHrmZgK5WrAsiBjgGAGQLkvg50xrWrJR EpoA==
Received: by 10.180.96.228 with SMTP id dv4mr3576212wib.14.1333011650302; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.96.134 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJNbMrzUWh0f9Y5cbWcMLixp+ogb2iXm0wiVCRL-mEET-1paVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJNbMrzUWh0f9Y5cbWcMLixp+ogb2iXm0wiVCRL-mEET-1paVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:00:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrxU7SkU_aF7nPv1Fm-YbDN6WZXU-NnqTVAtQQtUDvs5pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ashwin Rao <ashwin.shirvanthe@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell@jesup.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Discussion on Congestion Control
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:00:52 -0000

Hi Ashwin,

Most of the discussion related to congestion control for RTCWEB takes
place at rtp-congestion@alvestrand.no. Will be happy to join this
meeting.

Cheers,
Varun

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:36, Ashwin Rao <ashwin.shirvanthe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the iccrg presentations at IETF there were a good number of people
> who were interested in working on congestion control in RTCWeb. I am
> interested in working in this area and I have expressed my interest to
> a few people working on RTCWeb at Mozilla. I would like to know if
> people are interested in discussing the problems in this area. I am
> assuming that the people interested in this area would attend the
> conex wg meeting today. The conex presentation ends at 19:40 in room
> 253. We could meet in this room after the conex presentation and if
> required move to another room.
>
> Topics that I would like to discuss include
> 1. Is RTCWeb [ http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-congestion-01
> ]  being too conservative with respect to increasing the rate of
> sending packets.
> 2. How to address issues related to other delay based congestion
> control algorithms like Vegas.
> 3. Lessons learned from LEDBAT.
>
> Please feel free to add other topics.
>
> Regards,
> Ashwin
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb



-- 
http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/