Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

Could we please include also:
All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, Theora}

Thanks,
Silvia.

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
> <gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote:
>>
>> If we proceed with the vote, I would like to see the following choice:
>> All entities must support H263.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Gaëlle
>>
>
> I've updated the wiki to include this as choice 13.  If you have a reference
> that we could use that specifies version, annexes, or any other additional
> detail, we can include a pointer.
>
> Ted
>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gaelle
>> Martin-Cocher
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:29 AM
>> To: Magnus Westerlund; Emil Ivov
>> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
>> alternatives
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Sorry for this late message, I was not available this past week.
>>
>> It has been mentioned by a few of us that the risks on VP8 that some can't
>> leave with, can be mitigated when VP8 becomes an ISO standard (via MPEG).
>> VP8 has a chance to become an MPEG deliverable in January. I believe that
>> could make a few of us more comfortable with supporting/mandating both H264
>> and VP8 and could change the consensus reaching process.
>>
>> Can we give VP8 that chance before forcing a vote?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sincerely,
>> Gaëlle
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus
>> Westerlund
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:33 AM
>> To: Emil Ivov
>> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
>> alternatives
>>
>> On 2013-11-27 12:41, Emil Ivov wrote:
>> > Just to confirm, this is NOT the last day of discussion on whether a
>> > vote is the right way to do this at all, right?
>>
>> No, but tomorrow a week will have passed since we chairs sent out the
>> proposal and solicited feedback on the proposal.
>>
>> >
>> > That sounds like it would still be an open question for step two here:
>> >
>> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html
>>
>> As we stated in this message, after the week we chairs would update the
>> process proposal if we considered it necessary. I believe there are some
>> clarifications that needs to be done, including the voter eligibility.
>>
>> After that the stated plan was to hold a consensus call in the WG to use
>> the proposed process.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Magnus Westerlund
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
>> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
>> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
>> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
>> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
>> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
>> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
>> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
>> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
>> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
>> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>