IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EEE1A1AC8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:53:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7FP3CV5d917Z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:53:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCCA1A1A87 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:53:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id lj1so6281579pab.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:53:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZdXL+xw9+xACVQxvnE+cVZ6opp2s6V/OUO2MC6mUa20=; b=pNrgH/NXM2Oj48+GxcH3csB4jN59+7W09IOE9bg7+A3E7cvwlU+ocSApXQS8qYXGD5 YJu/qlk66y3fbx2Ofe0349LGRc3xKX6ozIPwBpkQp+PMJeIbZOlqdBy6NcwQ9Kiha9SD NbVfqfAi2EPgpEGe+1KyjSlASyEPGP0rA6jxDT2kGWjpNmF/UF3gYGbyeEGMIipSZrzd UZhO3rsA0Ti2qUB8Zve7VizyBXV5WtI/E9lL01GWRDdFYA3x50/kjW5LEw+scbRyStxX tWOtBdukV+54TPDeJeaT3wrRkp5O8yOsR248qIash1pm2Rlkm0TSRshcuM4hSQwLKTyx s4/g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.235.74 with SMTP id uk10mr531388pac.16.1418086421693; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.60.201 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:53:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBN5C0jT1SmDOzTZO71WMNfrWv0ZNTyH2sR4eeu+HjJOjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <5485CC5B.2030104@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnV4vhxBAQzr3BcL78uk+fSGi9DNvG=9XfdUsQekpWp5FA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3NbwmnU0eaZNzEQB4N8HxQjF61HgvOeMqVmA=uoLQ_TA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBN5C0jT1SmDOzTZO71WMNfrWv0ZNTyH2sR4eeu+HjJOjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:23:41 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGTj2MTUUTTd6b4dCaYpoTY3U5Y5XjVrMLieejZ4vGQ2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b15a4bd6d0ac00509bdf95e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/idlKqqtRSK37Cf57I8ZAiQxKToA
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:53:45 -0000

+1 for the rough consensus as presented by the chair and totally in favor
of the novel solution in the spirit of moving RTCweb forward.
Keeping end user's experience in mind and making RTCWeb an interoperable
platform  the consensus reached in Hawaii is a worthy compromise to proceed
further.

Cheers
Suhas



On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Just to reiterate what I said in the room, I agree with this.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>>
>> As stated before - I think this plan represents a legitimate compromise
>> in what had previously seemed like a stalemate. While not my ideal outcome,
>> I think this is good for the WebRTC ecosystem - it ensures
>> interoperability, and provides a reasonably clear path for reaching a
>> completely RF solution.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 December 2014 at 08:05, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Since others who were present in the room are repeating their position
>>> > on the list, I'll do so too.
>>>
>>> That's probably a good thing to do.  An almost anonymous humming sound
>>> isn't a good basis for establishing a record.
>>>
>>> > I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email