Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F99721F8D9E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.478, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4jrqA6960dJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FCA21F8D88 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=617; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1317220886; x=1318430486; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XrBoqcG6jUzAreVshwQMpoHduVXKRJfcDYxYF7zV10o=; b=XJrSBpitJ4RE2y/9ebKbCiHo1KV/jIGozZU4krL8LFw8AnYUb6Q9/Ekz uCQ3BET/fsN2nQe3hYu19f4ASN/v91aBvwAdyfp4evUdHlyue5uDjDtyV Ah9bNhV1x3MBZHDEGD+QARjR86Y4eI7vbBeNe+wLmlSqGhjfXHDqnxKKT s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANkxg06rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABBqAl4gVMBAQEBAgESASc0AgkFCwtGVwY1h1aaEAGeJIYrYQSHcotjhSKMMg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,456,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="4777814"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2011 14:41:25 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (sjc-fluffy-8914.cisco.com [10.20.249.165]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8SEfO1k027876; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:41:24 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU152-W295A7FCD81C6C902B37A3993F00@phx.gbl>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:41:23 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <59D7159A-422E-4F8B-B0E3-EA89594601C9@cisco.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com>, <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E80984A.903@skype.net>, <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1087@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <BLU152-W62B7F2AC3F0D5B6E277CB993F00@phx.gbl>, <CAD5OKxt=P3jg9N0weFUZLvUYQxyeXa+9YMtpc8wn7osuPQmTpg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxtVCgiFV_iAYd1w0uZZcS5+gsixOHJ0jGN=0CMdq++kdg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAOJ7v-3PrnNyesL+x-mto9Q9djjiJ13QZHXCiGfY1mv3nubrqQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxsKTHCuBQdUnGQtGfF7NmZZExLe9Q9B9cNR=483neuHPQ@mail.gmail.com> <BLU152-W295A7FCD81C6C902B37A3993F00@phx.gbl>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:38:38 -0000

On Sep 27, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

> I'm not going to use this mailing list as an advertising medium, but there do exist products that support both ICE and SRTP, and some of the companies you name below have deployed those products to *thousands* of their employees. 

I'd just like to +1 Bernard on this - a bunch of the stuff that I read on this list just not seem to match what I see shipping. Sure lots of stuff does not support ICE, or does not support SRTP, but vendors build what the market needs and where there is a need for these, vendors are building them.