Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 09 November 2011 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305D61F0C6F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:19:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2GNN8dC2O9Dx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3C41F0C5D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so2015971vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.33.239 with SMTP id u15mr7097798vdi.49.1320869951051; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:19:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.206 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:18:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058522357173CA@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfkVNVAs_MyU_-4koA4zRwSn1-FwLjY9g_oZVkhi9rSK5Q@mail.gmail.com> <8A61D801-D14D-408B-9875-63C37D0CC166@acmepacket.com> <CABw3bnPE=OY_h5bM7GA6wgrXiOBL8P4J0kw1jLv-GSpHAbg=Cg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNqdkh8u=gwOvKfDCQA7rXdAyQkfaM1r2Sx10787btP6A@mail.gmail.com> <B10FEFF6-0ADC-4DB1-83BB-50A11C65EC35@acmepacket.com> <CABcZeBNSXtim_VqzqAd8Z-u4zWSjaYmsVZPN=7sDYkJsgtRAHA@mail.gmail.com> <4EB7E6A5.70209@alvestrand.no> <F8003BA9-BCD8-4F02-B514-8B883FF90F91@acmepacket.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C01349D81@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <845C03B2-1975-4145-8F52-8CEC9E360AF3@edvina.net> <5454E693-5C34-4C77-BA07-2A9EE9EE4AFD@cisco.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C01349FFE@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206D3B7FD@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0134A105@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804691DA2@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com> <CALiegfmf59jb4asUu9LA6YY_aMtKEnM1Wy34KbuLEn3_h1xBXA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkWnRT8m4S9pXTxuLsc-p_bhkG3d=PX3qgiFFt5gW5yfw@mail.gmail.com> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206D3BA71@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <CALiegfkfqjChNkGJfQQ2SZT==UkmKD4=k_A8i7U0xkqgjeEgOQ@mail.gmail.com> <1D062974A4845E4D8A343C653804920206D3BAEE@XMB-BGL-414.cisco.com> <CALiegf=OXxRmKQu5FHBYOWrOUtV=69hnTQzU2ofMLORYbgS7Qw@mail.gmail.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058522357173CA@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:18:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfkozqj2DWWfNYvPjvuLNZQFyTOVeu3yOo0XXrMRb-XOvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Let's define the purpose of WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:19:12 -0000

2011/11/9 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>om>:
>> But if my call uses SRTP until the SIP media gateway, then it could
>> use plain RTP in the PSTN network. That's not so dangerous.
>
> So, in your example you are basically talking about "access network security", because you don't really care what happens (with regards to media security) after the WiFi access leg?

No. I said that, in case the other end is a PSTN peer, most *probably*
the call would end in a PSTN gateway which routes the call via PSTN,
so more or less "trusted".

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>