IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt

Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <saul@ag-projects.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBC221F901B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:54:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2saf73nBmEl for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node06.dns-hosting.info [85.17.186.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EF121F9014 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:54:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 7C09CB01BC; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:54:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.99.36] (ip3e830637.speed.planet.nl [62.131.6.55]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BF71B017D; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:54:07 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAJUQMgT1su-sjPhMBoff112wQdfYxCkUYcP5pspSav_EBuXOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:54:05 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <26B3BF3D-710A-4500-94CA-0C65973B43B6@ag-projects.com>
References: <20111031211134.8188.49554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EAF64FF.8020101@jesup.org> <CAAJUQMhCHHWqeUSKdn4SAS67ohF1y_QxCbc9KcgeybAe7N-5-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3-2ZL5fvsXxGiwjAh3TKe__PGdU+Aw0cR-fGqzT6Ht9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAAJUQMiyit3QvYJ3piuX26r4T5KtwLwWHX3NaC1wWL-zzeRftA@mail.gmail.com> <4EC133F1.8080606@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMgT1su-sjPhMBoff112wQdfYxCkUYcP5pspSav_EBuXOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:54:12 -0000

Hi,

On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:02 AM, Wolfgang Beck wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Harald Alvestrand
> <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> I believe the discussion above bears very little relationship to what has
>> been proposed.
>> As I read the proposal:
>> 
>> - Data channel does not touch the servers.
> I did not read it otherwise. However, the content of the data stream
> could be viewed as a 'codec'
> which has to be agreed upon, probably with parameters. And to do this
> 'codec' negotiation, the server-to-server protocol comes into play.
> 

Not sure if a codec is abstract enough. I could see the data channel as a candidate to do IM on the media plane, in the same fashion as MSRP (RFC 4975), but this would of course require a gateway. Is this scenario valid according to the data channel's mission or should it be pursued in another way?

Thanks,

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email