Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CFA1AE337 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrfoXhGbr_JS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92DF1AE33F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so572553wgh.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xi36cCy3ZD6mlo/LO1i+GxGZhIjSBDrKiy3I3ERsPrc=; b=cc6nhqi3xro1LE3uFFhqX0AhGvGoxCdTc+jMSzpnOjSC3vkMdWBMj2UtA9l5UpVhRU JQw9W1GnsbfFrWr6abiyeTJGQCf/98e5fyYNtQe0Jwcuwi+3I82jfb2Zw++/MRSRH7e8 ZkvcdnpbAUIGE6IkGelOkhS/p4elgyM00tjPrmqZ/WTyuOWSTd/Y6sukUKcCUZRWa6z1 /wRVGJ+zO8no5gSi4RfJYVrFHWfIXsrprZ74GxFsvw3NiCz3GBU8NyuRnddkCQOxxMFC 1Yn5h3FjtOaRyEgwLMYdMJXMN6QR3GLYPuLhY5uhGF+ygdCOQjBHRHYuPt8MOiNk2zEe Lc3g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.13.45 with SMTP id ev13mr7202794wjd.20.1385067135304; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.134.195 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <528E71AC.4040202@librevideo.org>
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <CAEqTk6RrHSzgJ9QA_spJQWN+6SaRWwwq6H4cwBxNbTHXnHmhYA@mail.gmail.com> <8647A71C-CDCF-4897-96D6-4CD1C6566BE6@cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1kdXreZbF0Q7=DinObV5=eWcdfFuwrJ13BQ0Hk=Fec-Q@mail.gmail.com> <528E5B47.70702@nostrum.com> <20131121204147.GV3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <528E71AC.4040202@librevideo.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:52:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUKPMTpMqX6G5=kDQomG9wgqZeTomOnjGecTFZ7T3GjfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:52:24 -0000

On 21 November 2013 12:48, Basil Mohamed Gohar
<basilgohar@librevideo.org> wrote:
> Has anyone actually objected to H.261 being the one MTI codec [...] ?

More than one person has already.

And I find the argument raised quite compelling.  It's hard to justify
spending valuable time and resources on implementing something that
crappy.