Re: [rtcweb] VP8 litigation in Germany?

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 March 2013 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2135421F9099 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xf8dUw+aDcS8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87C721F9075 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10so5581385ieb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NEdQlACN0qEEzhzsmX2/PiTAGsMTeeGzOhMyEbi5Iuc=; b=tS8H7coi5WciIk1pj7ofk+T2aTXMnsLFA+yxsR2rOPA/ljpG5RWBppEGdSZHPkpI/O yK9WzLFR9d2eI8C+Iei2QYIv8kzdhZDfHq5VKNn2V1whIK8FpAdmzteQmxVWbNWUl7+x 9ohvmzKIsikXa3TlCbEAFi0V9evlgD+VtNVz76yfvFUBQic3w6VTGpLXWXTnj6evm5ca oop3tn7/PbfDfQnagUnP6+qp+Wz+6iW7nKT1Q70KO3N4dExjrchDOcHE9G+fXFzCHB2x Kp7p9uBAnRo900eDYAfZeSmtSiLsx4gA+9XLryxjCV/Ocko8DMrN5t4aIZtGcxzLAMD2 4WzA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.87.196 with SMTP id ba4mr9562937igb.20.1363042046376; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.135.202 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B01121E@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CD613089.973B9%stewe@stewe.org> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7623BB2E7@008-AM1MPN1-042.mgdnok.nokia.com> <CA+9kkMAeubpx1XE7Up0ccyfrtMW_OiO46fn+TS_i3cTs9TLuhg@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B01121E@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:47:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDoLbdPWNUy=gQvn_dj46SA_kZOAAoQtFEAYbB5i2-j-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 litigation in Germany?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:47:27 -0000

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:23 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
<keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>
> As I believe there are no IETF documents that specify H.264 or VP8 directly, then you will not get a direct declaration.
>

This contradicts what I understood Markus to be saying, which is that
Nokia would supply one.  If I have misunderstood this text:

Nokia is preparing to do a disclosure about it to the  IETF "to ensure
that IETF working groups and participants have as much information
about any IPR constraints on a technical proposal as  possible".

I hope he will let me know.

thanks,

Ted