IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP

Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org> Fri, 11 November 2011 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dan-ietf@danyork.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B99D21F8AD2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:24:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.872
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.872 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25J+nLKpiXJX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E6821F8ABB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so4370681vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.178.163 with SMTP id cz3mr22682281vdc.43.1321035853584; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:24:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pc-00141.lodestar2.local (cpe-66-65-247-87.mass.res.rr.com. [66.65.247.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ey9sm18083298vdc.19.2011.11.11.10.24.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:24:12 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_306B0571-A55E-4768-85F6-BAAE1DA35FD8"
From: Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP1090D4D5685F6B147F5A03093DD0@phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:24:11 -0500
Message-Id: <C0607A52-6D23-4941-8462-11A0D3510022@danyork.org>
References: <4EB26D22.5090000@ericsson.com> <FA65A239-CC86-4AC3-8A5A-91B7701C3FB5@cisco.com> <BLU152-W488BAA56546BEA4D42B4C893DF0@phx.gbl> <4EBA741A.1010307@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMiv3EyT3MzAUCzfXusG2Md-DnkA0sa3Hnx5CGVdh919ag@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkCQv75=ACNB2vK1Mi=S4Q=nastG_LUgd1ohzSeKmBVtQ@mail.gmail.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0134A992@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfkZvViEmeOBpE00XyATLfRKs4EVii6UzuBFfW3a7KkNDw@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP1090D4D5685F6B147F5A03093DD0@phx.gbl>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:24:15 -0000

+1

On Nov 11, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

> +1
> 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo said:
>> 
>> WebRTC is not SIP...
>> 
>> IMHO we should stop talking about SIP in this WG....
> 
>> First priority is to define WebRTC regardless of federation...
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

-- 
Dan York  dyork@lodestar2.com
http://www.danyork.com/   skype:danyork
Phone: +1-802-735-1624
Twitter - http://twitter.com/danyork
--------------------------------------------------------
All comments and opinions are entirely my own and have no connection whatsoever to any employer, past or present. Indeed, by tomorrow even I might be disavowing these comments.
--------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email