Re: [rtcweb] Call for review

> On 6Mar, 2019, at 02:11, westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 6 Mar 2019, at 03:34, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com <mailto:juberti@google.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> We'll always mask any local addresses with mDNS, since we don't know if they're public or not. We will also provide a srflx candidate with the actual address should STUN tell us that information.
> 
> So the ‘always’ should be conditional on how the addresses are ‘found’?
> Perhaps a definition of Local IP addresses would help:
> “Local IP addresses means addresses discovered by interrogating the operating system for
> a list of available interfaces and their associated IP addresses” 

Isn’t this the definition of a host candidate?
That would have been my interpretation of local addresses any way.

> Plus a clarification that “these rules do not apply to addresses that are subsequently found via
> STUN or ICE - note that this may cause an address to be listed twice - once as a host candidate with a masked mdns
> and a second time with it’s IP address as a reflex candidate”
> 
> (I’ve a feeling there is section of the ICE RFC that talks about eliminating reflex candidates that duplicate host candidates 
> but can’t find it)

Yes it has. It might be hidden in one of the sections about peer reflexive candidates.

  Nils

> 
> Tim.  
> 
>> 
>> Agree though we should be consistent on terminology, will look into what the best option is there.
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:40 PM westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk <mailto:thp@westhawk.co.uk>> wrote:
>> On first reading it seems like there might be a conflation of private IP addresses and local IP addresses.
>> the [ip-handling] document uses the term 'Private local IP addresses’ where as this document
>> uses "private IP addresses” in the introduction but then uses "The local IPv4 address” without any
>> explanation (I can find) of the difference.
>> 
>> Surely this would mean that a standalone device (say a public kiosk) assigned a 
>> single routable public IP would mask that address with mdns.
>> 
>> Tim.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On 5 Mar 2019, at 20:22, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Howdy,
>> > 
>> > draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns is a very short draft describing two new modes  related to draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling using bits of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates.
>> > 
>> > The chairs would like to ask for a couple of reviews; given that it is four pages long, we are hopeful that it will not take much time.
>> > 
>> > Please send your review to the list,
>> > 
>> > thanks,
>> > 
>> > Ted
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rtcweb mailing list
>> > rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb