Re: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?

<markus.isomaki@nokia.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 03:12 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=388f0da97=markus.isomaki@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF441A1BA3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:12:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0Jsfef9bwtV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:12:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nok-msg-3.service.capgemini.fi (nok-msg-3.service.capgemini.fi [145.247.12.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FBF21A1BEC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO NOKWDCFIEXCH01P.nnok.nokia.com) ([10.50.38.49]) by noi-msg-3.service.capgemini.fi with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2014 05:12:01 +0200
Received: from NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com (10.50.38.50) by NOKWDCFIEXCH01P.nnok.nokia.com (10.50.38.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.38; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:12:00 +0200
Received: from NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com ([fe80::99d1:400a:d939:3ebe]) by NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com ([fe80::99d1:400a:d939:3ebe%17]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.031; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:11:55 +0200
From: <markus.isomaki@nokia.com>
To: <ron@debian.org>, <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?
Thread-Index: AQHP7+LLZ1FATfQqEkuoDIJCcWSHI5xfXjHggAAJ4QCAACXy0A==
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 03:11:54 +0000
Message-ID: <19c4eaabf2e9420c833f86a2ab0f9bdb@NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com>
References: <544117FB.6050706@alvestrand.no> <CAHgZEq6GTk5ei+LLpWPM5povpieompD66VU9F+u7--WJVgapaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+23+fGWnWd0QEeCmZ=6BmJkPrUVW6cZ0jwmXA+fM88=_+_NWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dugTtfLhk0VuJOk7OPEonGBApMjY93EZocH90RbX6X22w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHgZEq5t4-Cot9XkU_pfyfi0TBCUxfT79ZvpiLW=X5_KUQh5dA@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0ck_VtMnf6740rh0ku1Qct7s-xrJEfokg6oufEi4wgrYAw@mail.gmail.com> <D069AC57.49A8E%stewe@stewe.org> <D06D5403.49D1D%stewe@stewe.org> <544AE196.6080907@nostrum.com> <5a86546928b841e9b063354de2aa279d@NOKWDCFIEXCH02P.nnok.nokia.com> <20141114024252.GD10827@hex.shelbyville.oz>
In-Reply-To: <20141114024252.GD10827@hex.shelbyville.oz>
Accept-Language: en-US, fi-FI
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.50.31.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/jsLe1wmLXXvCx3PTi7sW1Z4zjVI
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 03:12:06 -0000

Hi,

Ron wrote:
>
> >There has been some criticism over how Opus was developed too,
> > but it was certainly a much more open and collaborative model than
> > what has happened with VP8 in MPEG.
> 
> Was that "criticism" made in public somewhere, ...
>
>...
> 
> If my memory is simply failing me, I'd welcome some pointers to things which
> back up your claims here to refresh it.
> 

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-videocodec-7.pdf

(But I don't think we should continue this discussion at RTCWEB list. The point was not to bash the Opus process, on the contrary.) 

Markus